On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 10:27:00 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 04/26/2017 09:55 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I was wondering if the upstream would be receptive to adding a
> 'Tested-by' tag for patches that had someone give tested feedback on the
> list.
If we are doing this, I suggest having 'Reviewed-by' too. It's merely
the same effort (if not a greater one).
Definitely greater. We don't get that much testing of patches upstream.
> I realize that if it's not automated (via Git hooks or
similar), it can
> become "lossy", i.e. if Joe posts v1 of a patch, you give a
'Tested-by',
> then there are two scenarios that immediately spring to mind:
>
> (1) Joe respins a v2 to make some corrections, adds your 'Tested-by'
> tag, and whoever applies the patch picks it up -- all good.
>
> (b) However, if a v2 was _not_ necessary, then whoever is applying the
> patch / series must remember to add the tag -- "lossy".
>
> Thoughts / remarks / rotten tomatoes welcome.
>
I think this is the clue for having this. If we can somehow make it easy
for contributors to append appropriate lines to the commit messages of
theirs then this has a chance to live. Otherwise, if I have to manually
copy-paste (or even worse write all the lines out manually), then the
I totally agree. If it's somehow automatable in a reasonable fashion to
apply the tags from e-mail to git then I might consider it.
chances as slim. Take a look at SoB line: it's very easy to
configure
and everybody uses it now.
I beg to differ.
I like the idea and I'm up for it, but frankly I have no idea
how
developers in other teams do it.
Unless there's reasonable automation, which I don't think will be easy I
will tend to not put those in. I'm lazy.