On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 08:59:45AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 05/11/2010 08:44 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> FYI, just pushed.
>
> I ran this command:
>
> cd tests && grep -l 'Copy.*Free.Sof' * |xargs perl -pi -e \
> 's/Copyright \(C\) (.*) Free Software Foundation,/Copyright (C) $1 Red
Hat,/'
While we're at it, should our tests be GPLv3 while the rest of libvirt
is LGPLv2? One could argue that it is okay, since the tests are not
installed, but it is still something we should be sure is intentional,
and not another accident of copy-and-paste from other FSF files.
It is not a showstopper if a test is GPLv3, but I think its wise to keep
all the source code including tests LGPLv2+ licensed unless there's a
particular exception required. This means we don't have to worry about
mixed licensing when copying code between different areas of our tree.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o-
http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org -o-
http://deltacloud.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|