Re: [libvirt] ANNOUNCE: Stable release libvirt-0.9.11.2

On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Jason Helfman <jhelfman(a)e-e.com&gt; wrote: >> Okay, I screwed up the tarball for the first stable release, due to not >> building it from a fresh checkout :/ No changes for this one except a >> version >> bump and dist rebuild. >> >> This release can be downloaded at: >> >> http://libvirt.org/sources/libvirt-0.9.11.2.tar.gz >> >> Thanks, >> Cole >> >> -- >> libvir-list mailing list >> libvir-list(a)redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list >> >> > > Is there any particular reason that the project is using the same naming > convention for stable releases? It appears to be a minor revision update > from the standard release cycle. From an outsiders prospective, I don't > know how anyone would think that 0.9.11.2 is not a standard update from > 0.9.11, as there is no distinction in either the name from the distributed > file, or documentation (unless I missed it denoted specifically on > libvirt.org). > > Would there be any objection to using a distribution file name > libvirt-stable-0.9.11.2.tar.gz ? > > To me, it is confusing, but that is just my opinion. > > Thanks, > Jason > Don't change the tarball name like that. That would just plain suck and be different than how 99% of projects out there do things.