[PATCH] [TEST] Add "AllocationCapabilities" to associate with ECTP
# HG changeset patch # User Yun Guo Lian <yunguol@cn.ibm.com> # Date 1235982224 28800 # Node ID d5a5a5558a89acac972e1620fc4d737bab8c0334 # Parent a26791e2890e59a1f02e5d7050da3d75f8f4e0e2 [TEST] Add "AllocationCapabilities" to associate with ECTP Tested for KVM/LXC with current sources on Pegsus Signed-off-by: Guolian Yun<yunguol@cn.ibm.com> diff -r a26791e2890e -r d5a5a5558a89 suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/ElementConforms/01_forward.py --- a/suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/ElementConforms/01_forward.py Fri Feb 27 03:17:05 2009 -0800 +++ b/suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/ElementConforms/01_forward.py Mon Mar 02 00:23:44 2009 -0800 @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ curr_cim_rev, changeset = get_provider_version(virt, server) if curr_cim_rev >= libvirt_cim_ectp_changes: cn_names2 = ["VirtualSystemMigrationService", "DiskPool", "NetworkPool", - "ProcessorPool", "MemoryPool"] + "ProcessorPool", "MemoryPool", "AllocationCapabilities"] cn_names.extend(cn_names2) if curr_cim_rev >= libvirt_cim_input_graphics_ectp: cn_names.append("ConsoleRedirectionService")
yunguol@cn.ibm.com wrote:
# HG changeset patch # User Yun Guo Lian <yunguol@cn.ibm.com> # Date 1235982224 28800 # Node ID d5a5a5558a89acac972e1620fc4d737bab8c0334 # Parent a26791e2890e59a1f02e5d7050da3d75f8f4e0e2 [TEST] Add "AllocationCapabilities" to associate with ECTP
Tested for KVM/LXC with current sources on Pegsus
Signed-off-by: Guolian Yun<yunguol@cn.ibm.com>
diff -r a26791e2890e -r d5a5a5558a89 suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/ElementConforms/01_forward.py --- a/suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/ElementConforms/01_forward.py Fri Feb 27 03:17:05 2009 -0800 +++ b/suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/ElementConforms/01_forward.py Mon Mar 02 00:23:44 2009 -0800 @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@
This test will need to be branched, because it'll fail on the most recent version of the F10 rpm: ElementConforms - 01_forward.py: FAIL ERROR - Exception: 'KVM_ElementConformsToProfile' returned (0) 'KVM_RegisteredProfile' objects CIM_ERR_INVALID_CLASS: Linux_ComputerSystem CIM_ERR_FAILED: Upcall enumInstances to target class failed -- Kaitlin Rupert IBM Linux Technology Center kaitlin@linux.vnet.ibm.com
libvirt-cim-bounces@redhat.com wrote on 2009-03-03 01:09:57:
yunguol@cn.ibm.com wrote:
# HG changeset patch # User Yun Guo Lian <yunguol@cn.ibm.com> # Date 1235982224 28800 # Node ID d5a5a5558a89acac972e1620fc4d737bab8c0334 # Parent a26791e2890e59a1f02e5d7050da3d75f8f4e0e2 [TEST] Add "AllocationCapabilities" to associate with ECTP
Tested for KVM/LXC with current sources on Pegsus
Signed-off-by: Guolian Yun<yunguol@cn.ibm.com>
diff -r a26791e2890e -r d5a5a5558a89 suites/libvirt- cim/cimtest/ElementConforms/01_forward.py --- a/suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/ElementConforms/01_forward.py Fri Feb 27 03:17:05 2009 -0800 +++ b/suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/ElementConforms/01_forward.py Mon Mar 02 00:23:44 2009 -0800 @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@
This test will need to be branched, because it'll fail on the most recent version of the F10 rpm:
ElementConforms - 01_forward.py: FAIL ERROR - Exception: 'KVM_ElementConformsToProfile' returned (0) 'KVM_RegisteredProfile' objects CIM_ERR_INVALID_CLASS: Linux_ComputerSystem CIM_ERR_FAILED: Upcall enumInstances to target class failed
This failure because of the unsupported association of CIM:DSP1041-ResourceAllocation-1.1.0c" to ECTP. Below is the error output on F10 rpm: [root@ cimtest]# wbemcli ain -ac KVM_ElementConformsToProfile 'http://root:password@localhost/root/virt:KVM_RegisteredProfile.InstanceID="CIM:DSP1041-ResourceAllocation-1.1.0c"' * * wbemcli: Cim: (1) CIM_ERR_FAILED: Upcall enumInstances to target class failed * We can't get expected result by ECTP from KVM__RegisteredProfile.InstanceID="CIM:DSP1041-ResourceAllocation-1.1.0c". With the latest src, I can get expected output on F10 current src. [root@ ~]# wbemcli ain -ac KVM_ElementConformsToProfile http://root:password@localhost/root/virt:KVM_RegisteredProfile.InstanceID='"CIM:DSP1041-ResourceAllocation-1.1.0c_d"' localhost/root/virt:KVM_ComputerSystem.CreationClassName="KVM_ComputerSystem",Name="domguest" To fix this, I have to skip this association query on F10 rpm. Thoughts?
-- Kaitlin Rupert IBM Linux Technology Center kaitlin@linux.vnet.ibm.com
_______________________________________________ Libvirt-cim mailing list Libvirt-cim@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim
Guo Lian Yun wrote:
libvirt-cim-bounces@redhat.com wrote on 2009-03-03 01:09:57:
yunguol@cn.ibm.com wrote:
# HG changeset patch # User Yun Guo Lian <yunguol@cn.ibm.com> # Date 1235982224 28800 # Node ID d5a5a5558a89acac972e1620fc4d737bab8c0334 # Parent a26791e2890e59a1f02e5d7050da3d75f8f4e0e2 [TEST] Add "AllocationCapabilities" to associate with ECTP
Tested for KVM/LXC with current sources on Pegsus
Signed-off-by: Guolian Yun<yunguol@cn.ibm.com>
diff -r a26791e2890e -r d5a5a5558a89 suites/libvirt- cim/cimtest/ElementConforms/01_forward.py --- a/suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/ElementConforms/01_forward.py Fri Feb 27 03:17:05 2009 -0800 +++ b/suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/ElementConforms/01_forward.py Mon Mar 02 00:23:44 2009 -0800 @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@
This test will need to be branched, because it'll fail on the most recent version of the F10 rpm:
ElementConforms - 01_forward.py: FAIL ERROR - Exception: 'KVM_ElementConformsToProfile' returned (0) 'KVM_RegisteredProfile' objects CIM_ERR_INVALID_CLASS: Linux_ComputerSystem CIM_ERR_FAILED: Upcall enumInstances to target class failed
This failure because of the unsupported association of CIM:DSP1041-ResourceAllocation-1.1.0c" to ECTP. Below is the error output on F10 rpm:
[root@ cimtest]# wbemcli ain -ac KVM_ElementConformsToProfile 'http://root:password@localhost/root/virt:KVM_RegisteredProfile.InstanceID="CIM:DSP1041-ResourceAllocation-1.1.0c"'
* * wbemcli: Cim: (1) CIM_ERR_FAILED: Upcall enumInstances to target class failed *
We can't get expected result by ECTP from KVM__RegisteredProfile.InstanceID="CIM:DSP1041-ResourceAllocation-1.1.0c".
With the latest src, I can get expected output on F10 current src.
[root@ ~]# wbemcli ain -ac KVM_ElementConformsToProfile http://root:password@localhost/root/virt:KVM_RegisteredProfile.InstanceID='"CIM:DSP1041-ResourceAllocation-1.1.0c_d"'
localhost/root/virt:KVM_ComputerSystem.CreationClassName="KVM_ComputerSystem",Name="domguest"
To fix this, I have to skip this association query on F10 rpm. Thoughts?
Right, you don't want to skip the whole test. Instead, you want to skip over passing the localhost/root/virt:KVM_RegisteredProfile.InstanceID="CIM:DSP1041-ResourceAllocation-1.1.0c" reference to the ECTP association. -- Kaitlin Rupert IBM Linux Technology Center kaitlin@linux.vnet.ibm.com
participants (3)
-
Guo Lian Yun -
Kaitlin Rupert -
yunguol＠cn.ibm.com