8:36 a.m.
# HG changeset patch
# User Deepti B. Kalakeri <deeptik(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
# Date 1207834557 -19800
# Node ID dac8e3a5491b28fd6946e6fabf0d4b14cd9921fe
# Parent 0e7eb39ed839e03d1dd2635157f19e5acdc4c9be
[TEST]Fixing 06_paused_active_suspend.py tc failure.
Signed-off-by: Deepti B. Kalakeri <deeptik(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
diff -r 0e7eb39ed839 -r dac8e3a5491b
suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/ComputerSystem/06_paused_active_suspend.py
--- a/suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/ComputerSystem/06_paused_active_suspend.py Thu Apr 10
19:04:30 2008 +0530
+++ b/suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/ComputerSystem/06_paused_active_suspend.py Thu Apr 10
19:05:57 2008 +0530
@@ -44,8 +44,6 @@ from time import sleep
from time import sleep
from XenKvmLib import computersystem
from XenKvmLib import vxml
-from VirtLib import utils
-from XenKvmLib.test_doms import destroy_and_undefine_all
from CimTest.Globals import log_param, logger
from CimTest.Globals import do_main
from XenKvmLib.common_util import call_request_state_change
@@ -61,6 +59,37 @@ FINAL_STATE = 9
FINAL_STATE = 9
REQUESTED_STATE = FINAL_STATE
TIME = "00000000000000.000000:000"
+
+def poll_for_status(server, virt, cxml, expstate):
+#Polling for the value of EnabledState to be set to expstate.
+#We need to wait for the EnabledState to be set appropriately since
+#it does not get set immediatley to value of expstate when created/suspended.
+ status = FAIL
+ timeout = 10
+ try:
+
+ for i in range(1, (timeout + 1)):
+ sleep(1)
+ cs = computersystem.get_cs_class(virt)(server, test_dom)
+ if cs.Name == test_dom:
+ to_RequestedState = cs.RequestedState
+ enabledState = cs.EnabledState
+ else:
+ logger.error("VS %s not found" % test_dom)
+ return status
+ if enabledState == expstate:
+ status = PASS
+ break
+
+ except Exception, detail:
+ logger.error("Exception variable: %s" % detail)
+
+ if status != PASS:
+ logger.error("Mismatching state values got %i instead of %i",
enabledState, expstate)
+ cxml.destroy(server)
+ cxml.undefine(server)
+
+ return status, to_RequestedState, enabledState
@do_main(sup_types)
def main():
@@ -87,45 +116,26 @@ def main():
cxml.destroy(options.ip)
cxml.undefine(options.ip)
return status
-
+
+ status, to_RequestedState, enabledState = poll_for_status(options.ip, options.virt,
cxml, 2)
+ if status != PASS or enabledState != 2:
+ return status
+
#Suspend the VS
- rc = call_request_state_change(test_dom, options.ip, REQUESTED_STATE,
- TIME, options.virt)
+ rc = call_request_state_change(test_dom, options.ip, REQUESTED_STATE, TIME,
options.virt)
if rc != 0:
logger.error("Unable to suspend dom %s using RequestedStateChange()",
test_dom)
cxml.destroy(options.ip)
cxml.undefine(options.ip)
return status
-#Polling for the value of EnabledState to be set to 9.
-#We need to wait for the EnabledState to be set appropriately since
-#it does not get set immediatley to value of 9 when suspended.
- timeout = 10
- try:
- for i in range(1, (timeout + 1)):
- sleep(1)
- cs = computersystem.get_cs_class(options.virt)(options.ip, test_dom)
- if cs.Name == test_dom:
- to_RequestedState = cs.RequestedState
- enabledState = cs.EnabledState
- else:
- logger.error("VS %s not found" % test_dom)
- return status
- if enabledState == FINAL_STATE:
- status = PASS
- break
-
- except Exception, detail:
- logger.error("Exception variable: %s" % detail)
- return status
-
+ status, to_RequestedState, enabledState = poll_for_status(options.ip, options.virt,
cxml,
+
FINAL_STATE)
if enabledState != FINAL_STATE:
logger.error("EnabledState has %i instead of %i", enabledState,
FINAL_STATE)
logger.error("Try to increase the timeout and run the test again")
if status != PASS:
- ret = cxml.destroy(options.ip)
- cxml.undefine(options.ip)
return status
# Success:
@@ -134,9 +144,8 @@ def main():
# To state == 2
# Enabled_state == RequestedState
- if from_State == START_STATE and \
- to_RequestedState == FINAL_STATE and \
- enabledState == to_RequestedState:
+ if from_State == START_STATE and to_RequestedState == FINAL_STATE and \
+ enabledState == to_RequestedState:
status = PASS
else:
logger.error("ERROR: VS %s transition from suspend State to Activate state
\
10:17 a.m.
+ try:
+
+ for i in range(1, (timeout + 1)):
+ sleep(1)
+ cs = computersystem.get_cs_class(virt)(server, test_dom)
+ if cs.Name == test_dom:
+ to_RequestedState = cs.RequestedState
+ enabledState = cs.EnabledState
+ else:
+ logger.error("VS %s not found" % test_dom)
+ return status
You'll want to break here, otherwise the guest doesn't get destroyed
properly.
+ if enabledState == expstate:
+ status = PASS
+ break
Instead of breaking here, you can just return since we've found the
value we're looking for.
-
+
+ status, to_RequestedState, enabledState = poll_for_status(options.ip, options.virt,
cxml, 2)
+ if status != PASS or enabledState != 2:
No need to verify enabledState == 2, the poll_for_status function do
this already.
+ return status
+
#Suspend the VS
- rc = call_request_state_change(test_dom, options.ip, REQUESTED_STATE,
- TIME, options.virt)
+ rc = call_request_state_change(test_dom, options.ip, REQUESTED_STATE, TIME,
options.virt)
This change causes the test to span multiple lines. I'll work on
sending out some suggested style guidelines and post them to the list to
see if people agree.
- except Exception, detail:
- logger.error("Exception variable: %s" % detail)
- return status
-
+ status, to_RequestedState, enabledState = poll_for_status(options.ip, options.virt,
cxml,
+
FINAL_STATE)
Unusual formatting here. Usually, the second line of arguments for a
function will line up with the first argument. Something like:
status, to_RequestedState, enabledState = poll_for_status(options.ip,
options.virt, cxml,
FINAL_STATE)
Hopefully the formatting of the email doesn't kill the illustration.
if enabledState != FINAL_STATE:
logger.error("EnabledState has %i instead of %i", enabledState,
FINAL_STATE)
logger.error("Try to increase the timeout and run the test again")
if status != PASS:
- ret = cxml.destroy(options.ip)
- cxml.undefine(options.ip)
Why remove the destroy and undefine here? The guest won't get cleaned
up properly.
return status
# Success:
@@ -134,9 +144,8 @@ def main():
# To state == 2
# Enabled_state == RequestedState
- if from_State == START_STATE and \
- to_RequestedState == FINAL_STATE and \
- enabledState == to_RequestedState:
+ if from_State == START_STATE and to_RequestedState == FINAL_STATE and \
+ enabledState == to_RequestedState:
This is unusual indention style. Usually, the new line starts just
below the if or the first part of the statement. So you'd have:
if from_State == START_STATE and to_RequestedState == FINAL_STATE and \
enabledState == to_RequestedState:
or
if from_State == START_STATE and to_RequestedState == FINAL_STATE and \
enabledState == to_RequestedState:
My preference is the latter. You can hold off on changing this patch
until we agree on a coding style.
--
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
kaitlin(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com
6059
days inactive
6060
days old
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Deepti B. Kalakeri -
Kaitlin Rupert