Kaitlin Rupert <kaitlin@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote on 2009-03-12 11:08:30:

Just in case you missed it on the list..

These messages you're seeing are expected failures. The test case is trying to destroy a guest that no longer exists. So you would expect to

see errors in the provider debug, right?

I debug the provider and get the error message. This failure because of the error message updates in VSMS provider. I send a patch with fix. Thanks for all your help =) Now, all the test failures are fixed for KVM. I will continue to cook up the new test cases to verify VSMS.RemoveResourceSettings(). On the next, I will start to fix failures for Xen/XenFV.

-- Kaitlin Rupert IBM Linux Technology Center kaitlin@linux.vnet.ibm.com

----- Message from Deepti B Kalakeri <deeptik@linux.vnet.ibm.com> on Mon, 09 Mar 2009 19:51:17 +0530 -----

To:

List for discussion and development of libvirt CIM <libvirt-cim@redhat.com>

Subject:

Re: [Libvirt-cim] Test Run Summary (Mar 09 2009): KVM on Fedora release 10 (Cambridge) with sfcb

Guo Lian Yun wrote:

...

libvirt-cim-bounces@redhat.com wrote on 2009-03-09 10:45:59:

...

libvirt-cim-bounces@redhat.com wrote on 2009-03-09 09:45:08:

...

================================================= Test Run Summary (Mar 09 2009): KVM on Fedora release 10

(Cambridge)with sfcb

...

================================================= Distro: Fedora release 10 (Cambridge) Kernel: 2.6.27.15-170.2.24.fc10.x86_64 libvirt: 0.4.5 Hypervisor: QEMU 0.9.1 CIMOM: sfcb sfcbd 1.3.3preview Libvirt-cim revision: 829 Libvirt-cim changeset: 1aff0d0e9bf4 Cimtest revision: 642 Cimtest changeset: 087aaba26589 ================================================= FAIL : 4 XFAIL : 3 SKIP : 5 PASS : 134 ----------------- Total : 146 ================================================= FAIL Test Summary: ElementCapabilities - 03_forward_errs.py: FAIL I've sent a patch with fix.

...

ElementConforms - 01_forward.py: FAIL Same as above.

...

ElementConforms - 04_ectp_rev_errs.py: FAIL Same as above.

...

VirtualSystemManagementService - 05_destroysystem_neg.py: FAIL

It seems this failure because that the provider has to free the nonexistent domain in invoking method DestroySystem.

Here is the debugger error in sfcb: libvir: Domain error : invalid domain pointer in virDomainFree libvir: QEMU error : Domain not found libvir: Domain error : invalid domain pointer in virDomainFree

Daisy,

The test case is written to verify the DestroySystem() returns an error when trying to remove non-existing domain and also when an invalid domain name is passed. The error statements returned seems to have changed.

For ex: The err desc for DestroySystem() when non-existing domain is passed was previously CIM_ERR_FAILED:Unable to retrieve domain name

is now changed to CIM_ERR_NOT_FOUND: Unable to retrieve domain name: Error 0

We need to change the way the error comparison is made. The comparison stmt like

if err_desc.find(exp_value['desc']) >= 0: does not work, but if exp_value['desc'] in err_desc: works

-- Thanks and Regards, Deepti B. Kalakeri IBM Linux Technology Center deeptik@linux.vnet.ibm.com

_______________________________________________ Libvirt-cim mailing list Libvirt-cim@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim