Kaitlin Rupert wrote:
# HG changeset patch # User Kaitlin Rupert <karupert@us.ibm.com> # Date 1195661851 28800 # Node ID 5c0b219865cd675d54d4a13230c549be93a4d144 # Parent 278c59f67cb1fe0520e8dfa7b118cd907e8f10a1 Adding the RASD related part.
This is based on the Resource Allocation Profile. My understanding is that we are implementing a setup similar to Figure 3 on page 31. In this case, we'll use the same RASD instance for State as well as Defined.
Updated to due to change in get_rasd_instance_from_ref(). Also updated structure and handler function names to avoid confusion.
Signed-off-by: Kaitlin Rupert <karupert@us.ibm.com>
Looks like just the naming convention type changes from Dan's earlier suggestions, right? Seems to fit how we tend to do things now, and is clear enough to me. +1 -- -Jay