3 Apr
2008
3 Apr
'08
4:02 p.m.
GY> As you said before, it's better to subscribe to a superclass and GY> get all three of the lifecycle indications. So I prepare to GY> change the test case do the setup for each type in a single file. Okay. GY> Also, the superclass named "CIM_Indication", right? Yes, I think that's the only common superclass.
How about a test that subscribes to a Xen indication and then creates a KVM guest to make sure that it doesn't get the KVM indication?
GY> You refer to the negative test case to Xen indication?
I'm not sure what you're asking here... -- Dan Smith IBM Linux Technology Center Open Hypervisor Team email: danms@us.ibm.com