Re: [Libvirt-cim] [PATCH 0 of 2] [TEST] bundles of ComputerSystemCreatedIndication tc
GY> As you said before, it's better to subscribe to a superclass and
GY> get all three of the lifecycle indications. So I prepare to
GY> change the test case do the setup for each type in a single file.
Okay.
GY> Also, the superclass named "CIM_Indication", right?
Yes, I think that's the only common superclass.
> How about a test that subscribes to a Xen indication and then
creates
> a KVM guest to make sure that it doesn't get the KVM indication?
>
GY> You refer to the negative test case to Xen indication?
I'm not sure what you're asking here...
--
Dan Smith
IBM Linux Technology Center
Open Hypervisor Team
email: danms(a)us.ibm.com
Attachments:
- attachment.sig (application/pgp-signature — 188 bytes)