Re: [Libvirt-cim] [PATCH] [TEST] Adding verification for DestroySystem() of the domain
>
> I took a look at this test, and you're right - the reason it's failing
> is because DestroySystem() is also undefined the guest. So the answer
> here is to modify the test so that it doesn't call undefine(). Also,
> make sure the guest isn't in the inactive domain list either.
>
> Not sure why you want to XFAIL the test, as DestroySystem() is doing
> what is expected.
>
I thought DestroySystem() is equivalent to "virsh destroy" command which
would just destroy a running domain which was defined and started.
Nope, DestroySystem() does a "virsh destroy" and "virsh undefine". If
you look at the System Virtualization Profile (DSP1042) under the
heading " 8.2.2 CIM_VirtualSystemManagementService.DestroySystem( )
Method (Conditional)", DestroySystem() is defined as:
"The execution of the DestroySystem( ) method shall effect the
destruction of the referenced virtual system
and all related virtual system configurations, including snapshots."
--
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
kaitlin(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com