Re: [Libvirt-cim] libvirt-cim rpm for Fedora 9 versus recent provider repository

GY> The processor id changed to domanin_name/proc, then does the GY> libvirt-cim rpm for Fedora 9 will reflect this recent changes? If GY> so, when is it time to replace? Also the same issues in terms of GY> MB versus KB for memory. I'm not sure if libvirt-cim rpm freezed, GY> then how cimtest are represent? Do we have to branch cimtest into GY> two parts, one for libvirt-cim rpm, the other for recent provider GY> changes? This is a good point. The Fedora 9 RPM has been unchanged for a while now, so none of the changes that you mention are included. I think that the test development should proceed to track the libvirt-cim development tree, but perhaps there is a way that we can map FAIL to XFAIL for older versions of the provider. Does anyone have a suggestion for a reasonable way we could do this? -- Dan Smith IBM Linux Technology Center Open Hypervisor Team email: danms(a)us.ibm.com