Re: [Libvirt-cim] [PATCH 1 of 2] Enhance RegisteredProfile to support getInstance and gets static ID
Heidi Eckhart wrote:
# HG changeset patch
# User Heidi Eckhart <heidieck(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
# Date 1193820858 -3600
# Node ID bd925f5f9fdacc3ed34b34eb17e348e8304ec382
# Parent 53903e7822dde586f073ffe469c544c1a37954a4
Enhance RegisteredProfile to support getInstance and gets static ID
Signed-off-by: Heidi Eckhart <heidieck(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-struct reg_prof Processor = {
+struct reg_prof SystemVirtualization = {
.reg_org = 2,
- .reg_name = "Processor Profile",
- .reg_version = "2.15",
- .provider_name = "Processor"
+ .reg_id = "DSP1042-1.0.0a",
+ .reg_name = "System Virtualization Profile",
+ .reg_version = "1.0.0a",
+ .provider_name = "HostSystem"
};
-struct reg_prof LogicalDisk = {
+struct reg_prof VirtualSystem = {
.reg_org = 2,
- .reg_name = "Logical Disk Profile",
- .reg_version = "2.15",
- .provider_name = "LogicalDisk"
-};
-
-struct reg_prof NetworkPort = {
- .reg_org = 2,
- .reg_name = "Network Port Profile",
- .reg_version = "2.15",
- .provider_name = "NetworkPort"
-};
-
-struct reg_prof ComputerSystem = {
- .reg_org = 2,
- .reg_name = "Computer System Profile",
- .reg_version = "2.15",
+ .reg_id = "DSP1057-1.0.0a",
+ .reg_name = "Virtual System Profile",
+ .reg_version = "1.0.0a",
.provider_name = "ComputerSystem"
};
-struct reg_prof SVP = {
- .reg_org = 2,
- .reg_name = "System Virtualization Profile",
- .reg_version = "2.15",
- .provider_name = "VirtualSystemManagementService"
-};
-
// Make sure to add pointer to your reg_prof struct here.
struct reg_prof *profiles[] = {
- &Processor,
- &LogicalDisk,
- &NetworkPort,
- &ComputerSystem,
- &SVP,
+ &SystemVirtualization,
+ &VirtualSystem,
NULL
};
One thing I forgot to ask about. Many of the profiles we were
advertising have been removed. Is this temporary, or is there a reason
to not advertise those? Also, I'm not so great at connecting the
non-obvious profiles with their providers, could you explain why the
System Virtualization Profile is now linked to HostSystem and not
VirtualSystemManagementService?
--
-Jay