Re: [Libvirt-cim] [PATCH 0 of 9] Reorganized association provider registration

KR> Applying these patches didn't fix the dups for me (btw, thanks for KR> finding the dups!). I think the Virt_ provider still gets called KR> twice. Yeah, with more testing, I still get dups as well. Changing back to a unified provider name doesn't change the fact that the CIMOM still calls the provider once per registered class. The unified case prevents us from having a key to filter on too. My previous statement about connect_by_classname() is invalid too, because we use the ref for connecting, which will be, for example, Xen_Foo in both cases (for the KVM instance and the Xen instance of the provider's registration). So, I think the bottom line is: We still need ASSOC_MATCH() and it is the proper way to fix this problem for the associations that we currently have without it. Right? -- Dan Smith IBM Linux Technology Center Open Hypervisor Team email: danms(a)us.ibm.com