KR> It's checking both virsh and the providers. The hack here is that
KR> virsh doesn't hit the caching issue. So if virsh lists the guest,
KR> then we poll until the providers see it.
Oh, okay, I see it now. I had lost sight of what the other patch did.
KR> Even still, the name is pretty poor. I'll think something else up and
KR> resend. =)
Well, I wonder if the other function needs a more clear name, since
it's what actually polls both. That might make this function name
make more sense.
--
Dan Smith
IBM Linux Technology Center
Open Hypervisor Team
email: danms(a)us.ibm.com