4 Aug
2008
4 Aug
'08
4:07 p.m.
KR> It's checking both virsh and the providers. The hack here is that KR> virsh doesn't hit the caching issue. So if virsh lists the guest, KR> then we poll until the providers see it. Oh, okay, I see it now. I had lost sight of what the other patch did. KR> Even still, the name is pretty poor. I'll think something else up and KR> resend. =) Well, I wonder if the other function needs a more clear name, since it's what actually polls both. That might make this function name make more sense. -- Dan Smith IBM Linux Technology Center Open Hypervisor Team email: danms@us.ibm.com