Heidi Eckhart wrote:
+
+char* dependent[] = {
+ "Xen_ResourceAllocationSettingData",
+ "KVM_ResourceAllocationSettingData",
+ NULL
+};
+
Using -arc Xen_ProcResourceAllocationSettingData in a query doesn't
work, but using -arc Xen_ResourceAllocationSettingData does work.
Should Xen_ProcResourceAllocationSettingData, etc also added to the
list? The instances we're returning aren't of type
Xen_ResourceAllocationSettingData, so it seems like we should accept
result class values that correspond to the class type we return.
However, the Virt_ResourceAllocationSettingData provider trips me up
more often than it should, so I might be way off base here. =)
--
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
karupert(a)us.ibm.com