Re: [Libvirt-cim] [PATCH] [RFC] Enhance handling of association's references
Heidi Eckhart wrote:
Dan Smith wrote:
> HE> # HG changeset patch
> HE> # User Heidi Eckhart <heidieck(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> HE> # Date 1195819371 -3600
> HE> # Node ID db20c6206fb6decb484035bec81d7c7f2be75eae
> HE> # Parent bf54de6af2e210bef57d74cf12e4872f6ba2da4f
> HE> [RFC] Enhance handling of association's references
>
> HE> The source and target classnames of std_assoc are now lists,
> HE> containing all supported classnames. This approach frees the
> HE> provider from listing all possible combinations as instances of
> HE> std_assoc.
>
> I'm tentatively okay with this approach. We need to make a decision
> and go with it so that we can freeze (at least to some extent) the
> libcmpiutil API and make an official code release.
If this approach is ok for all, then I can cook up a patch for each
association.
I'm also on the tentatively okay side. It looks sound, and should work,
but I always get a little tentative when we deal with the "who handles
what" type questions, as I'm a bit over my head on those most of the
time. I'd say that if nobody sees anything that looks outright wrong we
should go with it, as you seem to have a better understanding of how
that sort of thing should go than we do.
--
-Jay