Re: [Libvirt-cim] Re: CimTest Report for KVM on F9 07-05-2008
Kaitlin Rupert wrote:
>>> SettingsDefine - 02_reverse.py: FAIL
>> SDS expects InstanceID "testdom/0" instead of
"testdom/proc".
> The VirtualSystemSettingDataComponent association returns ProcRASD
> InstanceID of the form "testdom/proc", but the SettingsDefineState
> association expects the ProcRASD InstanceID of the form "testdom/0".
> I guess this is a known issue ?
>
The processor test cases were out of sync because processor related
changes. Jay's processor patch went into the tree today. Can you try
again with updated sources? A few of the test cases will need to be
changed to reflect the changes in provider behavior.
I updated the sources today and verified the above tc.
The above tc now passes, the SettingsDefineState association accepts the
ProcRASD InstanceID of the form. "testdom/proc"