Re: [Libvirt-cim] [PATCH V3 04/11] CSI, add lock to protect shared data

Since I don't have the email to reply-to, here is a link: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-cim/2012-December/msg00026.html Why was the decision to reuse the lifecycle_mutex rather than generating a data specific mutex? Seems like that mutex is used for other operations to protect filters and indications. Thus unless the two are somehow tied, I really think it'd be better to create/use a data specific mutex. Furthermore, there's a few mutex adds around thread mgmt that probably should be a separate patch. That is - the non "dom_list" protection additions appear to be different. John

_______________________________________________ Libvirt-cim mailing list Libvirt-cim(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim