Re: [Libvirt-cim] Re: Fw: [TEST] Test failure summary for Xen/XenFV with and without sblim base providers with current resource
>
> This is the intended behavior. The HosySystem class is just a
> placeholder - if the guest has the SBLIM providers installed, then the
> proper class to represent the host is Linux_ComputerSystem (this is the
> SBLIM provider that represents the "base" or host system).
>
> We don't want the HostSystem provider to return anything in this case,
> because there's no need for a placeholder.
If the HostSystem provider return NULL, how to make test case work?
Because
the test expects to return at least one Xen_HostSystem instance.
Would you please explain more for me on this? Any suggestion on fixing
them?
The test behavior needs to be changed for the sblim case.
1) If SBLIM: Enum of HostSystem doesn't return any instances
2) If not SBLIM: Enum of HostSystem returns a single instance
If you take a look at the get_host() in Virt_HostSystem.c, you'll get an
understanding of how the providers determine whether a SBLIM instance is
available on the system.
Does this help?
--
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
kaitlin(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com