Re: [Libvirt-cim] [PATCH] [TEST] Adding verification for DestroySystem() of the domain

>> >> I took a look at this test, and you're right - the reason it's >> failing is because DestroySystem() is also undefined the guest. So >> the answer here is to modify the test so that it doesn't call >> undefine(). Also, make sure the guest isn't in the inactive domain >> list either. >> >> Not sure why you want to XFAIL the test, as DestroySystem() is doing >> what is expected. >> > I thought DestroySystem() is equivalent to "virsh destroy" command > which would just destroy a running domain which was defined and started. > > Nope, DestroySystem() does a "virsh destroy" and "virsh undefine". If you look at the System Virtualization Profile (DSP1042) under the heading " 8.2.2 CIM_VirtualSystemManagementService.DestroySystem( ) Method (Conditional)", DestroySystem() is defined as: "The execution of the DestroySystem( ) method shall effect the destruction of the referenced virtual system and all related virtual system configurations, including snapshots."