Re: [Libvirt-cim] Re: Fw: [TEST] Test failure summary for Xen/XenFV with and without sblim base providers with current resource

My apologies for not responding to this on Friday. > > > > I'd do the following: > > > > 1) HostSystem: 01_enum.py - Enum Linux_ComputerSystem - if this

> > returns an instance, then the enum of HostSystem shouldn't return

> > instances. Otherwise, you should get back a HostSystem instance. > > Which namespace does Linux_ComputerSystem live in? The enum of > Linux_ComputerSystem > return NULL: > > [root@elm** ~]# wbemcli ein > http://root:password@localhost/root/virt:Linux_ComputerSystem > * > * wbemcli: Cim: (5) CIM_ERR_INVALID_CLASS: Linux_ComputerSystem > * root/virt is the namespace of the libvirt-cim providers. The SBLIM providers live in root/cimv2

> > Since the namespace of Linux_ComputerSystem is different from the > others, how to set > CIM_NS twice in one test case? That is to say, I have to set CIM_NS

> /root/virt when I enum > HostSystem, then the namespace have to be set others when I enum > Linux_ComputerSystem in > one test case. This is very similar to what we have to do for the ECTP test cases - RegisteredProfile lives in root/interop, while ComputerSystem lives in root/virt. I'd take a look at those test cases for ideas on how to handle multiple namespaces in one test. > > > > 2) For all other tests the depend on a HostSystem instance, do an

> > of HostSystem. If no instances are returned, do an enum of > > Linux_ComputerSystem and use that instance. > ttps://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim -- Kaitlin Rupert IBM Linux Technology Center kaitlin(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com _______________________________________________ Libvirt-cim mailing list Libvirt-cim(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim