Kaitlin Rupert wrote:
================================================= FAIL Test Summary: NetworkPort - 02_np_gi_errors.py: FAIL Passed on manual run. VirtualSystemManagementService - 09_procrasd_persist.py: FAIL The tc fails because the VirtualQuantity for the running guest is not the same as VirtualQuantity used when defining the guest. This tc Pass for Xen .
VirtualSystemManagementService - 14_define_sys_disk.py: FAIL The DiskRASD['Caption'] field is not set properly. This has been used in the test while customizing the values for DiskRASD to be passed before defining the domain. Need to verify this further since the F9 rpm with revision 613 worked fine. VirtualSystemMigrationService - 01_migratable_host.py: FAIL VirtualSystemMigrationService - 02_host_migrate_type.py: FAIL The test case are taking too long to start the domain to be migrated. The guest used to migrate which is in the define state seems in the mid of the transition from defined to start state. The State of the dom_migrate is set to "no state". VirtualSystemMigrationService - 05_migratable_host_errs.py: FAIL Passed on manual run.
VirtualSystemSettingDataComponent - 02_reverse.py: FAIL VirtualSystemSettingDataComponent - 03_vssdc_fwd_errs.py: FAIL VirtualSystemSettingDataComponent - 04_vssdc_rev_errs.py: FAIL Passed on manual run.
For the items that pass on a manual run, any idea why they fail in bulk run? I would need to see if NetworkPort - 02_np_gi_errors.py fails on bulk run again. This is the first time it has failed. But for the following tests I suspect the migration tests the reason.
VirtualSystemMigrationService - 05_migratable_host_errs.py: FAIL VirtualSystemSettingDataComponent - 02_reverse.py: FAIL VirtualSystemSettingDataComponent - 03_vssdc_fwd_errs.py: FAIL VirtualSystemSettingDataComponent - 04_vssdc_rev_errs.py: FAIL Most of the times the dom_migrate domain that is created on the host does not get cleaned. Since all the tc uses the same images, the consecutive tests fails when they try to create a new guest. The problem is seen only with Xen/XenFV and that too with the Rhel, if you remember we used to face the same problem with Rhel5.2 as well. It takes lot of virsh destroy commands to actually destroy the guest created by the migration tc. Sometimes I need to restart the xend to see the refreshed list of domains on the host. -- Thanks and Regards, Deepti B. Kalakeri IBM Linux Technology Center deeptik@linux.vnet.ibm.com