
================================================= FAIL Test Summary: ComputerSystem - 23_suspend_suspend.py: FAIL The above tc passed when run manually.
Do you know what caused the guest to fail to start? Does the test always fail during bulk run? It sounds like a guest from a previous test isn't being cleaned up properly. This will need to be fixed.
================================================= XFAIL Test Summary: ComputerSystem - 32_start_reboot.py: XFAIL ComputerSystem - 33_suspend_reboot.py: XFAIL ResourceAllocationFromPool - 05_RAPF_err.py: XFAIL The above RAFP tc is written to verify that RAFP returns appropriate error when a non-existing bridge or networkpool is used in defining a guest. But, the tc now XFAIL's because it returns a valid RAFP record.
This should be a failure and not an XFAIL. There's no bug number associated with the failure, so the logic of try_assoc() is incorrectly returning an XFAIL.
This is due to the use of the cim_define() in the test case. Before calling the cim_define() we make necessary changes to the XML configuration to reflect the invalid bridge/networkpool name. But when we use the cim_define() function we do not have any means where we can use the invalid networkpool name or bridgename.
cim_define() uses the VSSD and various RASD objects that belong to the instance of the VirtCIM class that is created. Instead of using modify_net_name(), the invalid network name should be passed in when the instance of VirtCIM is initialized.
Hence the DefineSystem() in the cim_define() goes ahead to define a guest with the valid networkpoolname and RAFP returns a record, which is against the test case. I ran the tc for Xen/XenFV and the tc fails there as well. Can we revert back to the define() [which used virsh to define the guest], which initially existed in the tc ??
If we use the virsh define, we're testing the virsh define call - the provider DefineSystem() is not being tested in this case. Wherever possible, we should be using DefineSystem() so that the provider stack is tested. -- Kaitlin Rupert IBM Linux Technology Center kaitlin@linux.vnet.ibm.com