In general, all of the same comments from the RPCS/07_DeleteResourcePool.py review apply here. As such, I'm not going to review this test. Can you wait until RPCS/07_DeleteResourcePool.py is in the tree before updating this test. Then you can rework this one based on the RPCS/07_DeleteResourcePool.py. Thanks! yunguol@cn.ibm.com wrote:
# HG changeset patch # User Guolian Yun <yunguol@cn.ibm.com> # Date 1240827432 25200 # Node ID 43a14ac09f6fe1f55c2be730c62ea2f3fac24140 # Parent e8dc06eefada41252ba8d27b08fcef8ef6604251 [TEST] Add new tc to validate that the Disk child pool can be deleted through the providers
Tested for KVM with current sources Signed-off-by: Guolian Yun<yunguol@cn.ibm.com>
diff -r e8dc06eefada -r 43a14ac09f6f suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/ResourcePoolConfigurationService/09_DeleteResourcePool_Disk.py
-- Kaitlin Rupert IBM Linux Technology Center kaitlin@linux.vnet.ibm.com