In general, all of the same comments from the
RPCS/07_DeleteResourcePool.py review apply here. As such, I'm not going
to review this test.
Can you wait until RPCS/07_DeleteResourcePool.py is in the tree before
updating this test. Then you can rework this one based on the
RPCS/07_DeleteResourcePool.py.
Thanks!
yunguol(a)cn.ibm.com wrote:
# HG changeset patch
# User Guolian Yun <yunguol(a)cn.ibm.com>
# Date 1240827432 25200
# Node ID 43a14ac09f6fe1f55c2be730c62ea2f3fac24140
# Parent e8dc06eefada41252ba8d27b08fcef8ef6604251
[TEST] Add new tc to validate that the Disk child pool can be deleted through the
providers
Tested for KVM with current sources
Signed-off-by: Guolian Yun<yunguol(a)cn.ibm.com>
diff -r e8dc06eefada -r 43a14ac09f6f
suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/ResourcePoolConfigurationService/09_DeleteResourcePool_Disk.py
--
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
kaitlin(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com