Re: [Libvirt-cim] [PATCH 10 of 12] SDS: Adoption of changes to std_assoc struct in std_association

Heidi Eckhart wrote:

+ +char* resource_allocation_setting_data[] = { + "Xen_ResourceAllocationSettingData", + "KVM_ResourceAllocationSettingData", + NULL +};

I think this has the same potiential issue as RAFP: should we also include the specific subclasses of Xen_ResourceAllocationSettingData (Xen_ProcResourceAllocationSettingData, etc?) in the list? -- Kaitlin Rupert IBM Linux Technology Center karupert@us.ibm.com