Dan Smith wrote:
KR> # HG changeset patch
KR> # User Kaitlin Rupert <karupert(a)us.ibm.com>
KR> # Date 1199740240 28800
KR> # Node ID 7281142059a1c419405addd2ba351c68fb719ff0
KR> # Parent abcb596636c9530009756b1aa1e8900a2f01d10e
KR> Replace printf() with CU_DEBUG in EAFP.
I'm all for cleanups of this fashion. However,
KR> - printf("Device %hhi:%s", type, dev_id);
KR> + CU_DEBUG("Device %hhi:%s", type, dev_id);
This looks like crufty debug that uses a platform-dependent bit-width
anyway. This and the rest in this file should probably be excised
instead of formalized. What do you think?
I can't really comment on the necessity of these particular statements,
but is there a way for use to print that value in a platform-independent
way?
--
-Jay