6:20 a.m.
# HG changeset patch
# User Zhengang Li <lizg(a)cn.ibm.com>
# Date 1208344854 -28800
# Node ID 5d2e26fe8b594894946b95598aac5c43a6d3f0d0
# Parent e54b31ce89af19ca0d4c40ce4b097685e34aa2c7
[TEST] Retrieve revision and changeset string
The two properties can be accessed in test cases as
'main.revision', 'main.changeset'
Signed-off-by: Zhengang Li <lizg(a)cn.ibm.com>
diff -r e54b31ce89af -r 5d2e26fe8b59 lib/CimTest/Globals.py
--- a/lib/CimTest/Globals.py Wed Apr 16 16:10:52 2008 +0800
+++ b/lib/CimTest/Globals.py Wed Apr 16 19:20:54 2008 +0800
@@ -135,6 +135,7 @@ def do_main(types=['Xen'], p=parser):
def do_try():
try:
log_param(options.debug==True)
+ revision, changeset = get_version(options.virt, options.ip)
from VirtLib.utils import setup_ssh_key
from XenKvmLib.test_doms import destroy_and_undefine_all
setup_ssh_key()
@@ -148,3 +149,16 @@ def do_main(types=['Xen'], p=parser):
return do_try
return do_type
+def get_version(virt, ip):
+ from pywbem import WBEMConnection
+ from XenKvmLib.classes import get_typed_class
+ conn = WBEMConnection('http://%s' % ip, (CIM_USER, CIM_PASS), CIM_NS)
+ vsms_cn = get_typed_class(virt, 'VirtualSystemManagementService')
+ try:
+ inst = conn.EnumerateInstances(vsms_cn)
+ revision = inst[0]['Revision']
+ changeset = inst[0]['Changeset']
+ except Exception:
+ return None, None
+ return revision, changeset
+
10:19 a.m.
ZL> # HG changeset patch
ZL> # User Zhengang Li <lizg(a)cn.ibm.com>
ZL> # Date 1208344854 -28800
ZL> # Node ID 5d2e26fe8b594894946b95598aac5c43a6d3f0d0
ZL> # Parent e54b31ce89af19ca0d4c40ce4b097685e34aa2c7
ZL> [TEST] Retrieve revision and changeset string
ZL> The two properties can be accessed in test cases as
ZL> 'main.revision', 'main.changeset'
This is a fine way to do this, but I'm curious: how will it impact the
performance of the test suite? If we do this before every test, will
it make the suite take a measurable amount of additional time to run?
These values won't change during a single run, so I had envisioned
this being fetched once at the beginning and passed to each test
case. That may not be feasible with the current architecture, so I
have no real complaint here, I'm just wondering.
--
Dan Smith
IBM Linux Technology Center
Open Hypervisor Team
email: danms(a)us.ibm.com
5:19 p.m.
Dan Smith wrote:
ZL> # HG changeset patch
ZL> # User Zhengang Li <lizg(a)cn.ibm.com>
ZL> # Date 1208344854 -28800
ZL> # Node ID 5d2e26fe8b594894946b95598aac5c43a6d3f0d0
ZL> # Parent e54b31ce89af19ca0d4c40ce4b097685e34aa2c7
ZL> [TEST] Retrieve revision and changeset string
ZL> The two properties can be accessed in test cases as
ZL> 'main.revision', 'main.changeset'
This is a fine way to do this, but I'm curious: how will it impact the
performance of the test suite? If we do this before every test, will
it make the suite take a measurable amount of additional time to run?
These values won't change during a single run, so I had envisioned
this being fetched once at the beginning and passed to each test
case. That may not be feasible with the current architecture, so I
have no real complaint here, I'm just wondering.
suites/libvirt-cim/main.py calls each testcase as an individual program,
so nothing really gets persisted except for the few things that get set
as environment variables.
I had originally thought do try was a good way to go, but the other
problem with this is that it forces libvirt-cim implementation details
into lib/CimTest/Globals.py, which is mostly implementation agnostic.
I suppose you could set these values as env variables, which would
provider faster access than writing the values out to a file or
something similar. We have a fair number of env vars already, and I
don't want to rely on them. But this might be a good place to argue the
use of them. =)
--
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
kaitlin(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com
6057
days inactive
6057
days old
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Dan Smith -
Kaitlin Rupert -
zli＠linux.vnet.ibm.com