>
> What we really want to do here is implement cim_start(). You're
> welcome to leave this as is, but eventually we'll need to replace this
> (and the cxml.start() calls) with a cim_start() call.
>
> This will be more uniform than using cim_define() to define a guest
> and then using a non-vxml related function to change the guest's
> state. But cim_start() (or cim_state_change(), whichever way you
> think is best) can be added at some later time.
I will modify these to use the cim_start in the next iterations, as I
would like to spend time in completing to support the tc to work with
the SBLIM changes.
Yep, that's fine by me. =)
--
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
kaitlin(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com