libvirt-cim-bounces(a)redhat.com wrote on 2008-11-10 14:35:33:
This will fail for F9 rpm.
It fails because of different error code and desc for F9 rpm and F10.
With invalid_instid_keyvalue, it expected to return {'rc' :
pywbem.CIM_ERR_FAILED, 'desc' : 'Unable to determine resource type'} for
F9,
but we expected to return {'rc' : pywbem.CIM_ERR_NOT_FOUND, 'desc' :
'No
such instance'} for F10.
I have to add a revision branch here. Would you tell me how to get the
revision number?
Thanks!
Regards,
Deepti.
yunguol(a)cn.ibm.com wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Guolian Yun <yunguol(a)cn.ibm.com>
> # Date 1226297098 28800
> # Node ID c85ded9735f60db2fc49475906e3611616a4a315
> # Parent 6591949e8afdddce6aa72022e33f0ce063ec60a1
> [TEST] Fix SettingsDefineCapabilities/03_forward_errs.py
>
> Signed-off-by: Guolian Yun <yunguol(a)cn.ibm.com>
>
> diff -r 6591949e8afd -r c85ded9735f6 suites/libvirt-
cim/cimtest/SettingsDefineCapabilities/03_forward_errs.py
> --- a/suites/libvirt-
cim/cimtest/SettingsDefineCapabilities/03_forward_errs.py Wed Nov
05 22:03:48 2008 -0800
> +++ b/suites/libvirt-
cim/cimtest/SettingsDefineCapabilities/03_forward_errs.py Sun Nov
09 22:04:58 2008 -0800
> @@ -40,9 +40,8 @@
> expr_values = {
> "invalid_instid_keyname" : { 'rc' : pywbem.CIM_ERR_FAILED,
> 'desc' : 'Missing InstanceID'},
> - "invalid_instid_keyvalue" : { 'rc' : pywbem.CIM_ERR_FAILED,
> - 'desc' : 'Unable to determine\
> - resource type' },
> + "invalid_instid_keyvalue" : { 'rc' :
pywbem.CIM_ERR_NOT_FOUND,
> + 'desc' : 'No such instance'},
> }
>
> def err_invalid_instid_keyname(virt, conn, field):
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libvirt-cim mailing list
> Libvirt-cim(a)redhat.com
>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim
>
_______________________________________________
Libvirt-cim mailing list
Libvirt-cim(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim