Jay Gagnon wrote:
> @@ -264,7 +265,7 @@ static CMPIStatus GetInstance(CMPIInstan
> goto out;
> }
>
> - inst = get_rasd_instance(context, ref, id, type);
> + inst = get_rasd_instance(context, ref, _BROKER, id, type);
>
>
Think you got the wrong broker there. Should be broker, not _BROKER,
right? Everything else looks fine. Assuming that _BROKER gets taken
care of, it's +1 from me.
The way the patch was generated made this piece confusing.
get_rasd_instance() is being called from the GetInstance() function in
Virt_RASD.c. Anytime a provider calls get_rasd_instance(), it will need
to pass it's own _BROKER.
--
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
karupert(a)us.ibm.com