Re: [Libvirt-cim] [PATCH] [TEST] Add the missing Address value in NetRASD init

DK> Don't we need to include the changeset number and revision number DK> before including this field ? I think if we run this version on DK> the F9, will it not fail ? No, it won't fail just because you give it more information than it needs, it just won't use that value. -- Dan Smith IBM Linux Technology Center Open Hypervisor Team email: danms(a)us.ibm.com