RE: [Libvirt-cim] On SLES 11 with SFCB Xen_HostSystem returns no instances
Jim,
So you are saying that we should not use Xen_HostSystem and that it cannot be relied on?
I am dealing with existing code that references the Xen_HostSystem successfully on
SLES10sp2 with libvirt-cim-0.4.1 installed, which is now broken in SLES 11 with
libvirt-cim-0.5.2. The SLES 10sp2 system is running tog-Pegasus where the SLES 11 system
is running SFCB. I was hoping for compatibility from one release to another. Perhaps the
choice of using Xen_HostSystem was a bad one?
I am trying to determine if I have found a bug in what is included in SLES 11 or if I may
be missing some unidentified dependency or configurations. Thoughts?
Thanks for your insights.
Dayne
-----Original Message-----
From: libvirt-cim-bounces(a)redhat.com [mailto:libvirt-cim-
bounces(a)redhat.com] On Behalf Of Jim Fehlig
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 3:56 PM
To: List for discussion and development of libvirt CIM
Subject: Re: [Libvirt-cim] On SLES 11 with SFCB Xen_HostSystem returns
no instances
Medlyn, Dayne (VSL - Ft Collins) wrote:
> In the SLES 11 distribution Novell is distributing libvirt-cim-0.5.2-
8.46 and registering it with the SFCB CIMOM. Does anyone know why the
enumeration of Xen_HostSystem returns no instances? I could not find
any mention of this on the mailing list.
>
The host is Linux_ComputerSystem instance in /root/cimv2. VMs are
associated to the host with Xen_HostedDependency association.
Jim
_______________________________________________
Libvirt-cim mailing list
Libvirt-cim(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim