Re: [Libvirt-cim] [PATCH 2 of 3] [TEST] KVMXML cim_define() support and KVM support for Profile.02
Zhengang Li wrote:
Kaitlin Rupert wrote:
> zli(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
>> # HG changeset patch
>> # User Zhengang Li <lizg(a)cn.ibm.com>
>> # Date 1208332735 -28800
>> # Node ID 32614eca2a5579389cc5b262eff8243b0ca2da82
>> # Parent 7c20d87e25c0cd53deba4dc8c48529d84bb740d9
>> [TEST] KVMXML cim_define() support and KVM support for Profile.02
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhengang Li <lizg(a)cn.ibm.com>
>>
>> diff -r 7c20d87e25c0 -r 32614eca2a55
>> suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/Profile/02_profile_to_elec.py
>
> This is a nice clean up and looks good to me. However, the test fails
> due to the "Address field missing from vsms.py" issue Deepti noted in
> her e-mail about Dan's emulator fix.
>
> For the Address fix, we'll need conditional behavior based on the
> changeset. So I'll hold off on applying this set.
I saw this patch when I was trying to update the cim_define() support
for KVM and others.
Is this still true that we'll need to do conditional behavior on
changeset?
I've tagged a release of the cimtest tree. So now, we'll be able to
check out a release that is tied to the latest release of libvirt-cim.
You won't need to use the conditional branch on this patch.
Sorry for the slow reply!
--
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
kaitlin(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com