Re: [Libvirt-cim] [PATCH] [TEST] fix ProcVirtualSystemSettingDataComponent InstanceID in VirtualSystemSettingDataComponent.02
Guo Lian Yun wrote:
# HG changeset patch
# User Guolian Yun <yunguol(a)cn.ibm.com>
# Date 1208917544 25200
# Node ID 8dbe1fdef56378d48b230487c096a49c70b49530
# Parent 113ac4b0bb4b7b1e29f3aae585ecf7b89958f60e
[TEST] fix ProcVirtualSystemSettingDataComponent InstanceID in
VirtualSystemSettingDataComponent.02
This fix will result in tc fails, actually, the InstancID intends to change to
"proc" instance of "0"
in provider, right?
I'm not sure I understand your question.
Signed-off-by: Guolian Yun <yunguol(a)cn.ibm.com>
diff -r 113ac4b0bb4b -r 8dbe1fdef563
suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/VirtualSystemSettingDataComponent/02_reverse.py
--- a/suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/VirtualSystemSettingDataComponent/02_reverse.py Tue Apr
22 15:16:28 2008 +0530
+++ b/suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/VirtualSystemSettingDataComponent/02_reverse.py Tue Apr
22 19:25:44 2008 -0700
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ def assoc_values(ip, assoc_info):
"""
status = PASS
rasd_list = {
- "proc_rasd" : '%s/%s' %(test_dom,0),
+ "proc_rasd" : '%s/%s' %(test_dom, "proc"),
This is the correct InstanceID. You can verify using:
wbemcli ein
http://localhost:5988/root/virt:KVM_ProcResourceAllocationSettingData
This fix works for me - does this patch cause the test case to fail for you?
--
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
kaitlin(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com