Re: [Libvirt-cim] [PATCH 6 of 6] Add another relationship to ElementCapabilities, the ResourcePool-AllocationCapabilities connection. Only supports the pool_to_alloc direction, because it is the only one that's terribly interesting, but the other direction will need to be added at some point

KR> Just a nit-picky thing here... why not call the AllocCapabilities KR> function that setups the instance? I think using the same KR> InstanceID for the AllocCapa as the pool might not always return KR> the correct instance because AllocCapa uses <pool type>/0 as the KR> InstanceID. But something like the NetworkingPool returns KR> "NetworkPool/xenbr0". So you'll be creating an instance with KR> "NetworkPool/xenbr0" as the InstanceID, which would conflict with KR> what EnumInstances from AllocCapa would return. I think AllocationCapabilities needs to change here. It think using the InstanceID from the pool makes the most sense. I'm not sure what the existing AllocationCapabilities stuff intended, but I'm assuming it will need to change to match this new stuff. Perhaps it was a hold-over from the days of one-pool-per-resource-type? Good catch, by the way :) -- Dan Smith IBM Linux Technology Center Open Hypervisor Team email: danms(a)us.ibm.com