Deepti B Kalakeri wrote:
======================================
CIM Test Report for XenFV
======================================
Distro : RHEL 5.2 Beta
Kernel : 2.6.18-88.el5xen
Xen version : 3.1.2-88.el5
Libvirt : libvirt-0.3.3-7.el5
CIMOM : pegasus
PyWBEM : pywbem-3.14
CIM Schema : cimv216Experimental
LibCMPIutil : 72
LibVirtCIM : 545
CIMTEST : 85
======================================
PASS : 54
FAIL : 45 (Test cases FAIL because of finally issue: 19 )
Wow, this is brutal even considering the 19 failures due to the finally
issue (that patch is in the tree now).
2 failed due to a provider not installed properly.
2 failed due to the "Address" issue you noted in response to Dan's
emulator patch.
XFAIL : 2
SKIP : 30
-----------------
Total : 129
======================================
Detailed Report
================
Cleaned log files.
Testing XenFV hypervisor
AllocationCapabilities - 01_enum.py: PASS
AllocationCapabilities - 02_alloccap_gi_errs.py: PASS
ComputerSystem - 01_enum.py: PASS
ComputerSystem - 02_nosystems.py: PASS
ComputerSystem - 03_defineVS.py: FAIL
ComputerSystem - 04_defineStartVS.py: FAIL
ComputerSystem - 05_activate_defined_start.py: XFAIL Bug: 85769
ComputerSystem - 06_paused_active_suspend.py: FAIL
InvokeMethod(RequestStateChange): CIM_ERR_FAILED: Domain not running
This is interesting.. I wonder if the domain dying before it can be
paused? Several other tests report errors related to a missing domain
(VirtualSystemManagementService - 02_destroysystem.py,
VirtualSystemManagementService - 05_destroysystem_neg.py).
Did see similar error in the logs for the other failing tests?
Thanks for the run!
--
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
kaitlin(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com