Re: [Libvirt-cim] [PATCH] Fix RASD provider unregistration

KR> That's a good idea, although you still have the problem of order. The KR> intermediate abstract class needs to be first in the list (so that is KR> is registered before its subclasses). It's probably a good idea to unregister the classes in the opposite order anyway, don't you think? That way if you have dependencies that you have to maintain, you can do that in the list. If we modify provider_register.sh to reverse the list if we're doing a de-register, then it should be good, right?