Re: [Libvirt-cim] PoolID RASD property
Dan Smith wrote:
JF> Should this property be filled in on get of RASD? Or is
client
JF> expected to follow associations to determine pool from which the
JF> allocation occurs? AFAICT, DSP1041 (RAP) is not clear on this.
You mean on regular RASDs that belong to guests?
Yes.
Looking up the pool membership during, say, enum of
the regular RASDs is just another latency-inducing step, but I suppose
it should be done...
Latency will be induced regardless, either on backend or by client
following associations :-(. But is it wise to induce latency on the
backend, where all users are affected? Is the latency increase on
backend small compared to client following associations?
I guess my question should really be directed at SVPC. Client
developers assume they can get resource pool from PoolID. Generally I
think the CIM model advocates associations to describe such
relationships. But RAP is not clear on this.
Thanks,
Jim