
15 Aug
2008
15 Aug
'08
5:38 p.m.
KR> Let say the user only specifies the RefConfig plus an additional net KR> device for the ResourceSettings. The value for count is 1 (because KR> that's the size of the array passed in). The net device isn't a KR> dup, so the value of index is bumped up to 1, and we return an KR> error. Oh, right, hmm. That must have been broken with refconf before, I think. That scenario worked for me in my testing, but I think I actually lucked out because of the way I was doing my resources. Hrm, I'll have to think about the best way to fix up the list max length. Thanks! -- Dan Smith IBM Linux Technology Center Open Hypervisor Team email: danms@us.ibm.com