Re: [Libvirt-cim] [PATCH] [TEST] .2# rebased VirtualSystemSettingDataComponent.02 for XenFV & KVM support

Guo Lian Yun wrote: > libvirt-cim-bounces(a)redhat.com wrote on 2008-04-21 23:16:27: > > > Guo Lian Yun wrote: > > > # HG changeset patch > > > # User Guolian Yun <yunguol(a)cn.ibm.com&gt; > > > # Date 1208746833 -28800 > > > # Node ID 359a198f236c0733587423009200fcde5c2a02f3 > > > # Parent 0d31dff13ae341fd6515dc844ee98c7b5300b71d > > > [TEST] .2# rebased VirtualSystemSettingDataComponent.02 for XenFV > > & KVM support > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Guolian Yun <yunguol(a)cn.ibm.com&gt; > > > > > > > This fails for me on F9 using KVM and latest sources. > > This fails because of the InstanceID of

> the "proc_rasd" is set by '%s/%s' %(test_dom,0) in 02, which can be

> passed > on Xen, actually, the InstanceID has to be update as %(test_dom, > "proc"), right? > Then it passes on KVM, fails on Xen. Below is the output of wbemein. I forgot to note in my previous mail - the patch worked for me when I tested with Xen. > > wbemein > http://root:password@localhost:5988/root/virt: Xen_ProcResourceAllocationSettingData > > localhost:5988/root/virt:Xen_ProcResourceAllocationSettingData. InstanceID="Domain-0/0" > > localhost:5988/root/virt:Xen_ProcResourceAllocationSettingData. InstanceID="Domain-0/1" Are you testing with current sources? > > I will fix the InstanceID in tc, then would you please apply it? > I didn't apply that patch yet - the commit message confused me (see my other mail).

Thanks! -- Kaitlin Rupert IBM Linux Technology Center kaitlin(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com _______________________________________________ Libvirt-cim mailing list Libvirt-cim(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim