libvirt-cim-bounces@redhat.com wrote on 2008-04-24 03:10:32:
Guo Lian Yun wrote:
libvirt-cim-bounces@redhat.com wrote on 2008-04-21 23:16:27:
Guo Lian Yun wrote:
# HG changeset patch # User Guolian Yun <yunguol@cn.ibm.com> # Date 1208746833 -28800 # Node ID 359a198f236c0733587423009200fcde5c2a02f3 # Parent 0d31dff13ae341fd6515dc844ee98c7b5300b71d [TEST] .2# rebased VirtualSystemSettingDataComponent.02 for XenFV & KVM support
Signed-off-by: Guolian Yun <yunguol@cn.ibm.com>
This fails for me on F9 using KVM and latest sources.
This fails because of the InstanceID of ProcResourceAllocationSettingData, the "proc_rasd" is set by '%s/%s' %(test_dom,0) in 02, which can be
passed on Xen, actually, the InstanceID has to be update as %(test_dom, "proc"), right? Then it passes on KVM, fails on Xen. Below is the output of wbemein.
I forgot to note in my previous mail - the patch worked for me when I tested with Xen.
Xen_ProcResourceAllocationSettingData
localhost:5988/root/virt:Xen_ProcResourceAllocationSettingData.
InstanceID="Domain-0/0"
localhost:5988/root/virt:Xen_ProcResourceAllocationSettingData.
InstanceID="Domain-0/1"
Are you testing with current sources?
I will fix the InstanceID in tc, then would you please apply it?
I didn't apply that patch yet - the commit message confused me (see my other mail).
With the latest sources, the patch together with the previous fix work of me on both Xen and KVM now. Sorry for my message confuses you. So I resubmit a new patch consisted the InstanceID fix and KVM & XenFV support.
Thanks!
-- Kaitlin Rupert IBM Linux Technology Center kaitlin@linux.vnet.ibm.com
_______________________________________________ Libvirt-cim mailing list Libvirt-cim@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim