libvirt-cim-bounces@redhat.com wrote on 2008-04-24 03:10:32:
> Guo Lian Yun wrote:
> > libvirt-cim-bounces@redhat.com wrote on 2008-04-21 23:16:27:
> >
> > > Guo Lian Yun wrote:
> > > > # HG changeset patch
> > > > # User Guolian Yun <yunguol@cn.ibm.com>
> > > > # Date 1208746833 -28800
> > > > # Node ID 359a198f236c0733587423009200fcde5c2a02f3
> > > > # Parent 0d31dff13ae341fd6515dc844ee98c7b5300b71d
> > > > [TEST] .2# rebased VirtualSystemSettingDataComponent.02 for XenFV
> > > & KVM support
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Guolian Yun <yunguol@cn.ibm.com>
> > > >
> > >
> > > This fails for me on F9 using KVM and latest sources.
> >
> > This fails because of the InstanceID of ProcResourceAllocationSettingData,
> > the "proc_rasd" is set by '%s/%s' %(test_dom,0) in 02, which can be
> > passed
> > on Xen, actually, the InstanceID has to be update as %(test_dom,
> > "proc"), right?
> > Then it passes on KVM, fails on Xen. Below is the output of wbemein.
>
> I forgot to note in my previous mail - the patch worked for me when I
> tested with Xen.
>
> >
> > wbemein
> > http://root:password@localhost:5988/root/virt:
> Xen_ProcResourceAllocationSettingData
> >
> > localhost:5988/root/virt:Xen_ProcResourceAllocationSettingData.
> InstanceID="Domain-0/0"
> >
> > localhost:5988/root/virt:Xen_ProcResourceAllocationSettingData.
> InstanceID="Domain-0/1"
>
> Are you testing with current sources?
>
> >
> > I will fix the InstanceID in tc, then would you please apply it?
> >
>
> I didn't apply that patch yet - the commit message confused me (see my
> other mail).
>
With the latest sources, the patch together with the previous fix work
of me on both Xen and KVM now. Sorry for my message confuses you.
So I resubmit a new patch consisted the InstanceID fix and KVM & XenFV support.
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Kaitlin Rupert
> IBM Linux Technology Center
> kaitlin@linux.vnet.ibm.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libvirt-cim mailing list
> Libvirt-cim@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim