Re: [Libvirt-cim] Re: Fw: [TEST] Test failure summary for Xen/XenFV with and without sblim base providers with current resource
libvirt-cim-bounces(a)redhat.com wrote on 2008-09-17 01:54:39:
> >
> > This is the intended behavior. The HosySystem class is just a
> > placeholder - if the guest has the SBLIM providers installed, then
the
> > proper class to represent the host is Linux_ComputerSystem
(this is
the
> > SBLIM provider that represents the "base" or
host system).
> >
> > We don't want the HostSystem provider to return anything in this
case,
> > because there's no need for a placeholder.
>
> If the HostSystem provider return NULL, how to make test case work?
> Because
> the test expects to return at least one Xen_HostSystem instance.
> Would you please explain more for me on this? Any suggestion on
fixing
> them?
>
The test behavior needs to be changed for the sblim case.
1) If SBLIM: Enum of HostSystem doesn't return any instances
2) If not SBLIM: Enum of HostSystem returns a single instance
If Enum of HostSystem doesn't return any instances with sblim base
provider installed,
how to deal with Host* related test case? The association will return
NULL through
HostSystem such as HostedResourcePool forward query, then what should we
do?
Thanks!
If you take a look at the get_host() in Virt_HostSystem.c, you'll
get an
understanding of how the providers determine whether a SBLIM instance
is
available on the system.
Does this help?
--
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
kaitlin(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com
_______________________________________________
Libvirt-cim mailing list
Libvirt-cim(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 2.3 KB)