libvirt-cim-bounces@redhat.com wrote on 2008-09-17 01:54:39:

> >  >
> >  > This is the intended behavior.  The HosySystem class is just a
> >  > placeholder - if the guest has the SBLIM providers installed, then the
> >  > proper class to represent the host is Linux_ComputerSystem (this is the
> >  > SBLIM provider that represents the "base" or host system).
> >  >
> >  > We don't want the HostSystem provider to return anything in this case,
> >  > because there's no need for a placeholder.
> >
> >   If the HostSystem provider return NULL, how to make test case work?
> > Because
> >   the test expects to return at least one Xen_HostSystem instance.
> >   Would you please explain more for me on this? Any suggestion on fixing
> > them?
> >
>
> The test behavior needs to be changed for the sblim case.
>
> 1) If SBLIM:  Enum of HostSystem doesn't return any instances
> 2) If not SBLIM:  Enum of HostSystem returns a single instance
>

  If Enum of HostSystem doesn't return any instances with sblim base provider installed,
  how to deal with Host* related test case? The association will return NULL through
  HostSystem such as HostedResourcePool forward query, then what should we do?
 
  Thanks!

> If you take a look at the get_host() in Virt_HostSystem.c, you'll get an
> understanding of how the providers determine whether a SBLIM instance is
> available on the system.
>
> Does this help?
>
> --
> Kaitlin Rupert
> IBM Linux Technology Center
> kaitlin@linux.vnet.ibm.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libvirt-cim mailing list
> Libvirt-cim@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim