Re: [Libvirt-cim] [PATCH] [TEST] Add a 10 second delay at the beginning of the test to fix failure in running automatically

> diff -r d409f1d12edd -r bc36b82c6bd0 suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/LogicalDisk/03_ld_gi_errs.py > --- a/suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/LogicalDisk/03_ld_gi_errs.py Wed Sep 03 22:54:35 2008 -0700 > +++ b/suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/LogicalDisk/03_ld_gi_errs.py Thu Sep 04 23:28:28 2008 -0700 > @@ -123,6 +123,7 @@ > diff -r d409f1d12edd -r bc36b82c6bd0 suites/libvirt- cim/cimtest/Memory/01_memory.py > --- a/suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/Memory/01_memory.py Wed Sep 03 22:54:35 2008 -0700 > +++ b/suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/Memory/01_memory.py Thu Sep 04 23:28:28 2008 -0700 > diff -r d409f1d12edd -r bc36b82c6bd0 suites/libvirt- cim/cimtest/NetworkPort/01_netport.py > --- a/suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/NetworkPort/01_netport.py Wed Sep 03 22:54:35 2008 -0700 > +++ b/suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/NetworkPort/01_netport.py Thu Sep 04 23:28:28 2008 -0700 > diff -r d409f1d12edd -r bc36b82c6bd0 suites/libvirt- cim/cimtest/RASD/02_enum.py > --- a/suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/RASD/02_enum.py Wed Sep 03 22: 54:35 2008 -0700 > +++ b/suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/RASD/02_enum.py Thu Sep 04 23: 28:28 2008 -0700 > diff -r d409f1d12edd -r bc36b82c6bd0 suites/libvirt- cim/cimtest/ResourceAllocationFromPool/01_forward.py > --- a/suites/libvirt- cim/cimtest/ResourceAllocationFromPool/01_forward.py Wed Sep 03 22:54:35 2008 -0700 > +++ b/suites/libvirt- cim/cimtest/ResourceAllocationFromPool/01_forward.py Thu Sep 04 23:28:28 2008 -0700 > diff -r d409f1d12edd -r bc36b82c6bd0 suites/libvirt- cim/cimtest/ResourceAllocationFromPool/05_RAPF_err.py > --- a/suites/libvirt- cim/cimtest/ResourceAllocationFromPool/05_RAPF_err.py Wed Sep 03 22:54:35 2008 -0700 > +++ b/suites/libvirt- cim/cimtest/ResourceAllocationFromPool/05_RAPF_err.py Thu Sep 04 23:28:28 2008 -0700 All of these tests fail with Xen and XenFV due to the libvirt caching issue. Instead of adding a 10 second delay, I think it's possible to get around the caching issue by changing the define() call to

Can you see if cim_define() works for you?

Thanks! -- Kaitlin Rupert IBM Linux Technology Center kaitlin(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com _______________________________________________ Libvirt-cim mailing list Libvirt-cim(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim