libvirt-cim-bounces@redhat.com wrote on 2008-09-05 22:48:01:

>   > diff -r d409f1d12edd -r bc36b82c6bd0
> suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/LogicalDisk/03_ld_gi_errs.py
> > --- a/suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/LogicalDisk/03_ld_gi_errs.py  
> Wed Sep 03 22:54:35 2008 -0700
> > +++ b/suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/LogicalDisk/03_ld_gi_errs.py  
> Thu Sep 04 23:28:28 2008 -0700
> > @@ -123,6 +123,7 @@
>
>
> > diff -r d409f1d12edd -r bc36b82c6bd0 suites/libvirt-
> cim/cimtest/Memory/01_memory.py
> > --- a/suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/Memory/01_memory.py   Wed Sep 03
> 22:54:35 2008 -0700
> > +++ b/suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/Memory/01_memory.py   Thu Sep 04
> 23:28:28 2008 -0700
>
> > diff -r d409f1d12edd -r bc36b82c6bd0 suites/libvirt-
> cim/cimtest/NetworkPort/01_netport.py
> > --- a/suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/NetworkPort/01_netport.py   Wed
> Sep 03 22:54:35 2008 -0700
> > +++ b/suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/NetworkPort/01_netport.py   Thu
> Sep 04 23:28:28 2008 -0700
>
> > diff -r d409f1d12edd -r bc36b82c6bd0 suites/libvirt-
> cim/cimtest/RASD/02_enum.py
> > --- a/suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/RASD/02_enum.py   Wed Sep 03 22:
> 54:35 2008 -0700
> > +++ b/suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/RASD/02_enum.py   Thu Sep 04 23:
> 28:28 2008 -0700
>
> > diff -r d409f1d12edd -r bc36b82c6bd0 suites/libvirt-
> cim/cimtest/ResourceAllocationFromPool/01_forward.py
> > --- a/suites/libvirt-
> cim/cimtest/ResourceAllocationFromPool/01_forward.py   Wed Sep 03
> 22:54:35 2008 -0700
> > +++ b/suites/libvirt-
> cim/cimtest/ResourceAllocationFromPool/01_forward.py   Thu Sep 04
> 23:28:28 2008 -0700
>
> > diff -r d409f1d12edd -r bc36b82c6bd0 suites/libvirt-
> cim/cimtest/ResourceAllocationFromPool/05_RAPF_err.py
> > --- a/suites/libvirt-
> cim/cimtest/ResourceAllocationFromPool/05_RAPF_err.py   Wed Sep 03
> 22:54:35 2008 -0700
> > +++ b/suites/libvirt-
> cim/cimtest/ResourceAllocationFromPool/05_RAPF_err.py   Thu Sep 04
> 23:28:28 2008 -0700
>
> All of these tests fail with Xen and XenFV due to the libvirt caching
> issue.  Instead of adding a 10 second delay, I think it's possible to
> get around the caching issue by changing the define() call to cim_define().
>
> Can you see if cim_define() works for you?

  They work for me when I use cim_define().
  Thanks for your suggestion!

>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Kaitlin Rupert
> IBM Linux Technology Center
> kaitlin@linux.vnet.ibm.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libvirt-cim mailing list
> Libvirt-cim@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim