Libvirt-cim handles networking differently. I think, we need to decide if
we want to change it and open a work item to handle it.
Regards,
Sharad Mishra
Open Virtualization
Linux Technology Center
IBM
Wayne Xia
<xiawenc(a)linux.vn
et.ibm.com> To
Sent by: List for discussion and development
libvirt-cim-bounc of libvirt CIM
es(a)redhat.com <libvirt-cim(a)redhat.com>
cc
08/09/11 12:16 AM Subject
[Libvirt-cim] Network-pool seems
not conform to profile
Please respond to
List for
discussion and
development of
libvirt CIM
<libvirt-cim@redh
at.com>
By executing following command:
wbemcli -nl ei
http://root:123456@localhost:5988/root/virt:KVM_NetworkPool
There would be 2 network pool, NetworkPool/default and
NetworkPool/0. I think NetworkPool/0 is OK, which represent the
primordial pool for network device, but NetworkPool/default should not
be there, because it comes from the calling of the libvirt's API which
returns the existing logical network device on the host, not the
network pool.
Another issue is that, it seems now libvirt-cim supports the creation
of NetworkPool as a child, but the libvirt now does not support that.
So I think this function should be removed, otherwise we need extra
files to record the organization of the network pools.
--
Best Regards
Wayne Xia
mail:xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com
tel:86-010-82450803
_______________________________________________
Libvirt-cim mailing list
Libvirt-cim(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim