Libvirt-cim handles networking differently. I think, we need to decide if we want to change it and open a work item to handle it.

Regards,
Sharad Mishra
Open Virtualization
Linux Technology Center
IBM

Inactive hide details for Wayne Xia ---08/09/2011 12:18:34 AM---By executing following command:Wayne Xia ---08/09/2011 12:18:34 AM---By executing following command:

          Wayne Xia <xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
          Sent by: libvirt-cim-bounces@redhat.com

          08/09/11 12:16 AM
          Please respond to
          List for discussion and development of libvirt CIM <libvirt-cim@redhat.com>


To

List for discussion and development of libvirt CIM <libvirt-cim@redhat.com>

cc


Subject

[Libvirt-cim] Network-pool seems not conform to profile

By executing following command:
wbemcli -nl ei
http://root:123456@localhost:5988/root/virt:KVM_NetworkPool


There would be 2 network pool, NetworkPool/default and
NetworkPool/0. I think NetworkPool/0 is OK, which represent the
primordial pool for network device, but NetworkPool/default should not
be there, because it comes from the calling of the libvirt's API which
returns the existing logical network device on the host, not the
network pool.

Another issue is that, it seems now libvirt-cim supports the creation
of NetworkPool as a child, but the libvirt now does not support that.
So I think this function should be removed, otherwise we need extra
files to record the organization of the network pools.


--
Best Regards

Wayne Xia
mail:xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com
tel:86-010-82450803

_______________________________________________
Libvirt-cim mailing list
Libvirt-cim@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim