Re: Fw: [TEST] Test failure summary for Xen/XenFV with and without sblim base providers with current resource
12:31 a.m.
Guo Lian Yun/China/IBM wrote on 2008-09-10 15:46:25:
Deepti,
Here is my updates today.
Xen (8)
XenFV (11)
Xen with sblim base providers installed (33)
Person Responsible
ComputerSystem - 01_enum.py
ComputerSystem - 32_start_reboot.py
ComputerSystem - 32_start_reboot.py
ComputerSystem - 32_start_reboot.py
submitted patch for this.
ElementCapabilities - 01_forward.py
ElementCapabilities - 02_reverse.py
ElementCapabilities - 05_hostsystem_cap.py
ElementConforms - 01_forward.py
ElementConforms - 02_reverse.py
EnabledLogicalElementCapabilities - 01_enum.py
The Host* related tests fails because that I get none when enumerate
HostSystem with sblim base provider installed.
Below query return NULL to me.
wbemcli ein http://root:password@localhost/root/virt:Xen_HostSystem
Here is the output when I debug HostSystem - 01_enum.py test case.
Virt_HostSystem.c(164): SBLIM: Returned instance
misc_util.c(72): Connecting to libvirt with uri `xen'
misc_util.c(199): URI of connection is: xen:///
Virt_HostSystem.c(164): SBLIM: Returned instance
I will continue to look into this, please let me know if you know more
about it.
Thanks!
HostSystem - 01_enum.py
HostSystem - 02_hostsystem_to_rasd.py
HostSystem - 03_hs_to_settdefcap.py
HostSystem - 04_hs_to_EAPF.py
HostSystem - 05_hs_gi_errs.py
HostSystem - 06_hs_to_vsms.py
HostedDependency - 01_forward.py
HostedDependency - 02_reverse.py
HostedDependency - 03_enabledstate.py
HostedDependency - 04_reverse_errs.py
HostedResourcePool - 01_forward.py
HostedResourcePool - 02_reverse.py
HostedResourcePool - 03_forward_errs.py
HostedService - 01_forward.py
HostedService - 02_reverse.py
HostedService - 03_forward_errs.py
HostedService - 04_reverse_errs.py
LogicalDisk - 02_nodevs.py
#2 patch under review
LogicalDisk - 03_ld_gi_errs.py
LogicalDisk - 03_ld_gi_errs.py
fix
Memry - 01_memory.py
Memory - 01_memory.py
fix
NetworkPort - 01_netport.py
NetworkPort - 01_netport.py
fix
RASD - 02_enum.py
fix
ResourceAllocationFromPool - 01_forward.py
fix
ResourceAllocationFromPool - 05_RAPF_err.py
fix
ResourcePoolConfigurationService - 01_enum.py
ResourcePoolConfigurationService - 02_rcps_gi_errors.py
VSSD - 02_bootldr.py
VSSD - 02_bootldr.py
#2 patch under review
VSSD - 04_vssd_to_rasd.py
VSSD - 04_vssd_to_rasd.py
#2 patch under review
VirtualSystemManagementService - 06_addresource.py
VirtualSystemManagementService - 06_addresource.py
VirtualSystemManagementService - 06_addresource.py
Sent the tc failures analysis
VirtualSystemManagementService - 08_modifyresource.py
VirtualSystemManagementService - 08_modifyresource.py
VirtualSystemManagementService - 08_modifyresource.py
This did not fail again for me.
VirtualSystemMigrationService - 02_host_migrate_type.py
Under analysis.
VirtualSystemSnapshotService - 01_enum.py
VirtualSystemSnapshotService - 02_vs_sservice_gi_errs.py
Best,
Regards
Daisy (运国莲)
VSM Team, China Systems & Technology Labs (CSTL)
E-mail: yunguol(a)cn.ibm.com
TEL: (86)-21-60922403
Building 10, 399 Ke Yuan Rd, Pudong Shanghai, 201203
----- Forwarded by Guo Lian Yun/China/IBM on 2008-09-10 15:46 -----
Guo Lian Yun/China/IBM
2008-09-09 14:36
To
Deepti B Kalakeri/India/IBM@IBMIN@IBMAU
cc
Kaitlin Rupert/Beaverton/IBM@IBMUS
Subject
Re: [TEST] Test failure summary for Xen/XenFV with and without sblim
base providers with current resource
Update the table.
Xen (8)
XenFV (11)
Xen with sblim base providers installed (33)
Person Responsible
ComputerSystem - 01_enum.py
ComputerSystem - 32_start_reboot.py
ComputerSystem - 32_start_reboot.py
ComputerSystem - 32_start_reboot.py
submitted patch for this.
ElementCapabilities - 01_forward.py
ElementCapabilities - 02_reverse.py
ElementCapabilities - 05_hostsystem_cap.py
ElementConforms - 01_forward.py
ElementConforms - 02_reverse.py
EnabledLogicalElementCapabilities - 01_enum.py
HostSystem - 01_enum.py
HostSystem - 02_hostsystem_to_rasd.py
HostSystem - 03_hs_to_settdefcap.py
HostSystem - 04_hs_to_EAPF.py
HostSystem - 05_hs_gi_errs.py
HostSystem - 06_hs_to_vsms.py
HostedDependency - 01_forward.py
HostedDependency - 02_reverse.py
HostedDependency - 03_enabledstate.py
HostedDependency - 04_reverse_errs.py
HostedResourcePool - 01_forward.py
HostedResourcePool - 02_reverse.py
HostedResourcePool - 03_forward_errs.py
HostedService - 01_forward.py
HostedService - 02_reverse.py
HostedService - 03_forward_errs.py
HostedService - 04_reverse_errs.py
LogicalDisk - 02_nodevs.py
Patch under review
LogicalDisk - 03_ld_gi_errs.py
LogicalDisk - 03_ld_gi_errs.py
Patch under review
Memry - 01_memory.py
Memory - 01_memory.py
Patch under review
NetworkPort - 01_netport.py
NetworkPort - 01_netport.py
Patch under review
RASD - 02_enum.py
Patch under review
ResourceAllocationFromPool - 01_forward.py
Patch under review
ResourceAllocationFromPool - 05_RAPF_err.py
Patch under review
ResourcePoolConfigurationService - 01_enum.py
ResourcePoolConfigurationService - 02_rcps_gi_errors.py
VSSD - 02_bootldr.py
VSSD - 02_bootldr.py
VSSD - 04_vssd_to_rasd.py
VSSD - 04_vssd_to_rasd.py
VirtualSystemManagementService - 06_addresource.py
VirtualSystemManagementService - 06_addresource.py
VirtualSystemManagementService - 06_addresource.py
Sent the tc failures analysis
VirtualSystemManagementService - 08_modifyresource.py
VirtualSystemManagementService - 08_modifyresource.py
VirtualSystemManagementService - 08_modifyresource.py
This did not fail again for me.
VirtualSystemMigrationService - 02_host_migrate_type.py
Under analysis.
VirtualSystemSnapshotService - 01_enum.py
VirtualSystemSnapshotService - 02_vs_sservice_gi_errs.py
Best,
Regards
Daisy (运国莲)
VSM Team, China Systems & Technology Labs (CSTL)
E-mail: yunguol(a)cn.ibm.com
TEL: (86)-21-60922403
Building 10, 399 Ke Yuan Rd, Pudong Shanghai, 201203
Deepti B Kalakeri/India/IBM@IBMIN
2008-09-05 20:59
To
Guo Lian Yun/China/IBM@IBMCN@IBMAU
cc
Kaitlin Rupert/Beaverton/IBM@IBMUS, Kaitlin Rupert/Beaverton/IBM@IBMUS
Subject
Re: [TEST] Test failure summary for Xen/XenFV with and without sblim
base providers with current resource
Updated the table.
Xen (8)
XenFV (11)
Xen with sblim base providers installed (33)
Person Responsible
ComputerSystem - 01_enum.py
ComputerSystem - 32_start_reboot.py
ComputerSystem - 32_start_reboot.py
ComputerSystem - 32_start_reboot.py
submitted patch for this.
ElementCapabilities - 01_forward.py
ElementCapabilities - 02_reverse.py
ElementCapabilities - 05_hostsystem_cap.py
ElementConforms - 01_forward.py
ElementConforms - 02_reverse.py
EnabledLogicalElementCapabilities - 01_enum.py
HostSystem - 01_enum.py
HostSystem - 02_hostsystem_to_rasd.py
HostSystem - 03_hs_to_settdefcap.py
HostSystem - 04_hs_to_EAPF.py
HostSystem - 05_hs_gi_errs.py
HostSystem - 06_hs_to_vsms.py
HostedDependency - 01_forward.py
HostedDependency - 02_reverse.py
HostedDependency - 03_enabledstate.py
HostedDependency - 04_reverse_errs.py
HostedResourcePool - 01_forward.py
HostedResourcePool - 02_reverse.py
HostedResourcePool - 03_forward_errs.py
HostedService - 01_forward.py
HostedService - 02_reverse.py
HostedService - 03_forward_errs.py
HostedService - 04_reverse_errs.py
LogicalDisk - 02_nodevs.py
LogicalDisk - 03_ld_gi_errs.py
LogicalDisk - 03_ld_gi_errs.py
Memry - 01_memory.py
Memory - 01_memory.py
NetworkPort - 01_netport.py
NetworkPort - 01_netport.py
RASD - 02_enum.py
ResourceAllocationFromPool - 01_forward.py
ResourceAllocationFromPool - 05_RAPF_err.py
ResourcePoolConfigurationService - 01_enum.py
ResourcePoolConfigurationService - 02_rcps_gi_errors.py
VSSD - 02_bootldr.py
VSSD - 02_bootldr.py
VSSD - 04_vssd_to_rasd.py
VSSD - 04_vssd_to_rasd.py
VirtualSystemManagementService - 06_addresource.py
VirtualSystemManagementService - 06_addresource.py
VirtualSystemManagementService - 06_addresource.py
Sent the tc failures analysis
VirtualSystemManagementService - 08_modifyresource.py
VirtualSystemManagementService - 08_modifyresource.py
VirtualSystemManagementService - 08_modifyresource.py
This did not fail again for me.
VirtualSystemMigrationService - 02_host_migrate_type.py
Under analysis.
VirtualSystemSnapshotService - 01_enum.py
VirtualSystemSnapshotService - 02_vs_sservice_gi_errs.py
Thanks and Regards,
Deepti.
3 p.m.
New subject: Fw: [TEST] Test failure summary for Xen/XenFV with and without sblim base providers with current resource
>
The Host* related tests fails because that I get none when enumerate
HostSystem with sblim base provider installed.
Below query return NULL to me.
wbemcli ein http://root:password@localhost/root/virt:Xen_HostSystem
Here is the output when I debug HostSystem - 01_enum.py test case.
Virt_HostSystem.c(164): SBLIM: Returned instance
misc_util.c(72): Connecting to libvirt with uri `xen'
misc_util.c(199): URI of connection is: xen:///
Virt_HostSystem.c(164): SBLIM: Returned instance
I will continue to look into this, please let me know if you know more
about it.
Thanks!
This is the intended behavior. The HosySystem class is just a
placeholder - if the guest has the SBLIM providers installed, then the
proper class to represent the host is Linux_ComputerSystem (this is the
SBLIM provider that represents the "base" or host system).
We don't want the HostSystem provider to return anything in this case,
because there's no need for a placeholder.
--
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
kaitlin(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com
1:33 a.m.
New subject: Fw: [TEST] Test failure summary for Xen/XenFV with and without sblim base providers with current resource
libvirt-cim-bounces(a)redhat.com wrote on 2008-09-12 04:00:48:
> >
> The Host* related tests fails because that I get none when enumerate
> HostSystem with sblim base provider installed.
> Below query return NULL to me.
> wbemcli ein http://root:password@localhost/root/virt:Xen_HostSystem
>
> Here is the output when I debug HostSystem - 01_enum.py test case.
> Virt_HostSystem.c(164): SBLIM: Returned instance
> misc_util.c(72): Connecting to libvirt with uri `xen'
> misc_util.c(199): URI of connection is: xen:///
> Virt_HostSystem.c(164): SBLIM: Returned instance
>
> I will continue to look into this, please let me know if you know more
> about it.
>
> Thanks!
This is the intended behavior. The HosySystem class is just a
placeholder - if the guest has the SBLIM providers installed, then the
proper class to represent the host is Linux_ComputerSystem (this is the
SBLIM provider that represents the "base" or host system).
We don't want the HostSystem provider to return anything in this case,
because there's no need for a placeholder.
If the HostSystem provider return NULL, how to make test case work?
Because
the test expects to return at least one Xen_HostSystem instance.
Would you please explain more for me on this? Any suggestion on fixing
them?
Thanks!
--
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
kaitlin(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com
_______________________________________________
Libvirt-cim mailing list
Libvirt-cim(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim
12:54 p.m.
New subject: Fw: [TEST] Test failure summary for Xen/XenFV with and without sblim base providers with current resource
>
> This is the intended behavior. The HosySystem class is just a
> placeholder - if the guest has the SBLIM providers installed, then the
> proper class to represent the host is Linux_ComputerSystem (this is the
> SBLIM provider that represents the "base" or host system).
>
> We don't want the HostSystem provider to return anything in this case,
> because there's no need for a placeholder.
If the HostSystem provider return NULL, how to make test case work?
Because
the test expects to return at least one Xen_HostSystem instance.
Would you please explain more for me on this? Any suggestion on fixing
them?
The test behavior needs to be changed for the sblim case.
1) If SBLIM: Enum of HostSystem doesn't return any instances
2) If not SBLIM: Enum of HostSystem returns a single instance
If you take a look at the get_host() in Virt_HostSystem.c, you'll get an
understanding of how the providers determine whether a SBLIM instance is
available on the system.
Does this help?
--
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
kaitlin(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com
7:28 a.m.
New subject: Fw: [TEST] Test failure summary for Xen/XenFV with and without sblim base providers with current resource
libvirt-cim-bounces(a)redhat.com wrote on 2008-09-17 01:54:39:
> >
> > This is the intended behavior. The HosySystem class is just a
> > placeholder - if the guest has the SBLIM providers installed, then
the
> > proper class to represent the host is Linux_ComputerSystem
(this is
the
> > SBLIM provider that represents the "base" or
host system).
> >
> > We don't want the HostSystem provider to return anything in this
case,
> > because there's no need for a placeholder.
>
> If the HostSystem provider return NULL, how to make test case work?
> Because
> the test expects to return at least one Xen_HostSystem instance.
> Would you please explain more for me on this? Any suggestion on
fixing
> them?
>
The test behavior needs to be changed for the sblim case.
1) If SBLIM: Enum of HostSystem doesn't return any instances
2) If not SBLIM: Enum of HostSystem returns a single instance
If Enum of HostSystem doesn't return any instances with sblim base
provider installed,
how to deal with Host* related test case? The association will return
NULL through
HostSystem such as HostedResourcePool forward query, then what should we
do?
Thanks!
If you take a look at the get_host() in Virt_HostSystem.c, you'll
get an
understanding of how the providers determine whether a SBLIM instance
is
available on the system.
Does this help?
--
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
kaitlin(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com
_______________________________________________
Libvirt-cim mailing list
Libvirt-cim(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim
2:47 p.m.
New subject: Fw: [TEST] Test failure summary for Xen/XenFV with and without sblim base providers with current resource
>
> The test behavior needs to be changed for the sblim case.
>
> 1) If SBLIM: Enum of HostSystem doesn't return any instances
> 2) If not SBLIM: Enum of HostSystem returns a single instance
>
If Enum of HostSystem doesn't return any instances with sblim base
provider installed,
how to deal with Host* related test case? The association will return
NULL through
HostSystem such as HostedResourcePool forward query, then what should
we do?
This will be changed in the future. The problem is that
Linux_ComputerSystem lives in a different namespace, so we need to make
the association providers handle the different namespaces.
In the SBLIM case, you'll want to use Linux_ComputerSystem instead of
HostSystem. However, we don't support that yet. I'd add a bug to the
cimtest wiki and then have the tests XFAIL in the situation where you
need to use Linux_ComputerSystem to resolve an association.
--
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
kaitlin(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com
7:02 a.m.
New subject: Fw: [TEST] Test failure summary for Xen/XenFV with and without sblim base providers with current resource
libvirt-cim-bounces(a)redhat.com wrote on 2008-09-18 03:47:56:
> >
> > The test behavior needs to be changed for the sblim case.
> >
> > 1) If SBLIM: Enum of HostSystem doesn't return any instances
> > 2) If not SBLIM: Enum of HostSystem returns a single instance
> >
>
> If Enum of HostSystem doesn't return any instances with sblim base
> provider installed,
> how to deal with Host* related test case? The association will
return
> NULL through
> HostSystem such as HostedResourcePool forward query, then what
should
> we do?
>
This will be changed in the future. The problem is that
Linux_ComputerSystem lives in a different namespace, so we need to make
the association providers handle the different namespaces.
In the SBLIM case, you'll want to use Linux_ComputerSystem instead of
HostSystem. However, we don't support that yet. I'd add a bug to the
cimtest wiki and then have the tests XFAIL in the situation where you
need to use Linux_ComputerSystem to resolve an association.
Then how to verify the test use Linux_ComputerSystem instead of
HostSystem in test? One way is to check if sblim base provider is
installed,
the other way is to check the return instance of enumerate HostSystem.
Any other suggestion?
Thanks!
--
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
kaitlin(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com
_______________________________________________
Libvirt-cim mailing list
Libvirt-cim(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim
10:41 a.m.
New subject: Fw: [TEST] Test failure summary for Xen/XenFV with and without sblim base providers with current resource
> >
>
> This will be changed in the future. The problem is that
> Linux_ComputerSystem lives in a different namespace, so we need to make
> the association providers handle the different namespaces.
>
> In the SBLIM case, you'll want to use Linux_ComputerSystem instead of
> HostSystem. However, we don't support that yet. I'd add a bug to the
> cimtest wiki and then have the tests XFAIL in the situation where you
> need to use Linux_ComputerSystem to resolve an association.
Then how to verify the test use Linux_ComputerSystem instead of
HostSystem in test? One way is to check if sblim base provider is
installed,
the other way is to check the return instance of enumerate HostSystem.
Any other suggestion?
Thanks!
I'd do the following:
1) HostSystem: 01_enum.py - Enum Linux_ComputerSystem - if this call
returns an instance, then the enum of HostSystem shouldn't return any
instances. Otherwise, you should get back a HostSystem instance.
2) For all other tests the depend on a HostSystem instance, do an enum
of HostSystem. If no instances are returned, do an enum of
Linux_ComputerSystem and use that instance.
Does this help?
--
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
kaitlin(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com
8:31 p.m.
New subject: Fw: [TEST] Test failure summary for Xen/XenFV with and without sblim base providers with current resource
libvirt-cim-bounces(a)redhat.com wrote on 2008-09-18 23:41:40:
> > >
> >
> > This will be changed in the future. The problem is that
> > Linux_ComputerSystem lives in a different namespace, so we need to
make
> > the association providers handle the different
namespaces.
> >
> > In the SBLIM case, you'll want to use Linux_ComputerSystem instead
of
> > HostSystem. However, we don't support that yet.
I'd add a bug to
the
> > cimtest wiki and then have the tests XFAIL in the
situation where
you
> > need to use Linux_ComputerSystem to resolve an
association.
>
> Then how to verify the test use Linux_ComputerSystem instead of
> HostSystem in test? One way is to check if sblim base provider is
> installed,
> the other way is to check the return instance of enumerate
HostSystem.
> Any other suggestion?
>
> Thanks!
>
I'd do the following:
1) HostSystem: 01_enum.py - Enum Linux_ComputerSystem - if this call
returns an instance, then the enum of HostSystem shouldn't return any
instances. Otherwise, you should get back a HostSystem instance.
Which namespace does Linux_ComputerSystem live in? The enum of
Linux_ComputerSystem
return NULL:
[root@elm** ~]# wbemcli ein
http://root:password@localhost/root/virt:Linux_ComputerSystem
*
* wbemcli: Cim: (5) CIM_ERR_INVALID_CLASS: Linux_ComputerSystem
*
Since the namespace of Linux_ComputerSystem is different from the others,
how to set
CIM_NS twice in one test case? That is to say, I have to set CIM_NS as
/root/virt when I enum
HostSystem, then the namespace have to be set others when I enum
Linux_ComputerSystem in
one test case.
Thanks!
2) For all other tests the depend on a HostSystem instance, do an enum
of HostSystem. If no instances are returned, do an enum of
Linux_ComputerSystem and use that instance.
Does this help?
--
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
kaitlin(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com
_______________________________________________
Libvirt-cim mailing list
Libvirt-cim(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim
3:49 p.m.
New subject: Fw: [TEST] Test failure summary for Xen/XenFV with and without sblim base providers with current resource
My apologies for not responding to this on Friday.
>
> I'd do the following:
>
> 1) HostSystem: 01_enum.py - Enum Linux_ComputerSystem - if this call
> returns an instance, then the enum of HostSystem shouldn't return any
> instances. Otherwise, you should get back a HostSystem instance.
Which namespace does Linux_ComputerSystem live in? The enum of
Linux_ComputerSystem
return NULL:
[root@elm** ~]# wbemcli ein
http://root:password@localhost/root/virt:Linux_ComputerSystem
*
* wbemcli: Cim: (5) CIM_ERR_INVALID_CLASS: Linux_ComputerSystem
*
root/virt is the namespace of the libvirt-cim providers. The SBLIM
providers live in root/cimv2
Since the namespace of Linux_ComputerSystem is different from the
others, how to set
CIM_NS twice in one test case? That is to say, I have to set CIM_NS as
/root/virt when I enum
HostSystem, then the namespace have to be set others when I enum
Linux_ComputerSystem in
one test case.
This is very similar to what we have to do for the ECTP test cases -
RegisteredProfile lives in root/interop, while ComputerSystem lives in
root/virt.
I'd take a look at those test cases for ideas on how to handle multiple
namespaces in one test.
>
> 2) For all other tests the depend on a HostSystem instance, do an enum
> of HostSystem. If no instances are returned, do an enum of
> Linux_ComputerSystem and use that instance.
ttps://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim
--
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
kaitlin(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com
8:59 p.m.
New subject: Fw: [TEST] Test failure summary for Xen/XenFV with and without sblim base providers with current resource
libvirt-cim-bounces(a)redhat.com wrote on 2008-09-23 04:49:53:
My apologies for not responding to this on Friday.
> >
> > I'd do the following:
> >
> > 1) HostSystem: 01_enum.py - Enum Linux_ComputerSystem - if this
call
> > returns an instance, then the enum of HostSystem
shouldn't return
any
> > instances. Otherwise, you should get back a HostSystem
instance.
>
> Which namespace does Linux_ComputerSystem live in? The enum of
> Linux_ComputerSystem
> return NULL:
>
> [root@elm** ~]# wbemcli ein
> http://root:password@localhost/root/virt:Linux_ComputerSystem
> *
> * wbemcli: Cim: (5) CIM_ERR_INVALID_CLASS: Linux_ComputerSystem
> *
root/virt is the namespace of the libvirt-cim providers. The SBLIM
providers live in root/cimv2
Thanks! I can enumerate it in root/cimv2 namespace.
>
> Since the namespace of Linux_ComputerSystem is different from the
> others, how to set
> CIM_NS twice in one test case? That is to say, I have to set CIM_NS
as
> /root/virt when I enum
> HostSystem, then the namespace have to be set others when I enum
> Linux_ComputerSystem in
> one test case.
This is very similar to what we have to do for the ECTP test cases -
RegisteredProfile lives in root/interop, while ComputerSystem lives in
root/virt.
I'd take a look at those test cases for ideas on how to handle multiple
namespaces in one test.
> >
> > 2) For all other tests the depend on a HostSystem instance, do an
enum
> > of HostSystem. If no instances are returned, do an enum
of
> > Linux_ComputerSystem and use that instance.
>
ttps://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim
--
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
kaitlin(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com
_______________________________________________
Libvirt-cim mailing list
Libvirt-cim(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim
5933
days inactive
5945
days old
10 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Guo Lian Yun -
Kaitlin Rupert