Daniel P. Berrange schrieb:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:10:47AM +0200, Christian Weyermann wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrange schrieb:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 04:05:39AM -0400, Jim Paris wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 11:35:00AM +0200, Christian Weyermann wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hello everybody,
>>>>>
>>>>> I encountered the following problem. I want my users to only be able
to
>>>>> connect to their own virtual machines via VNC. Is there any way to do
so?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> The VNC authentication setup is currently being done per-host, so there
>>>> is no way to define ACLs per-(user,vm) tuple as you describe.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> What about the VNC password?
>>> That's per-VM, isn't it?
>>>
>>>
>> That is true by I don't really consider VNC password to be useful. It is
>> utterly insecure. If you want to have plain passwords, then its better to
>> use the new SASL authentication method, with its Digest-MD5 plugin. That
>> is still not top-grade security, but it is better then VNC password and
>> allows configuration of arbitrary Username+pasword pairs.. At which point
>> we just need ACLs against the usernames. SASL also provide Kerberos auth,
>> where we can do an ACL against the Kerberos principle name. And VeNCrypt
>> provides TLS+x509 certificates which you can either layer SASL over again,
>> or require client x509 certs and do an ACL against the client CNAME
>>
> Ok, so let me sumarize: It is possible to define username+password pairs
> via SASL. SASL can also sync with Kerberos. So the only problem left is,
> that there is no way to assign a specific username to a VM. So, what we
> need is a plugin, where we have an username and a virtual machine as
> input and we need to refuse the connection, if this pair is not valid.
> The VNC Server is part of libvirt, so the perfect method to add this
> functionallity would be the VNC Servers authenticate or start method.
>
> However, a Windows user is still not able to connect as there is no
> windows vnc client capable of doing SASL.
>
GTK-VNC builds on Windows, and so does libvirt. So the intent was that
we'd be able to have virt-viewer working on Windows using those two.
Oh, when I say Windows, i mean Mingw32
Ok, so the other part of the post is correct? So what do you think about
the effort for implementing this feature?