Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] blockjob: don't remove older-style mirror XML

On 06/16/2014 03:47 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > Commit 7c6fc39 introduced a regression in the XML produced for older > clients. The argument at the time was that clients shouldn't be > depending on output-only data for something that is only going to > be triggered for a transient guest; but John Ferlan reported that > the automated testsuite was such a client. It's better to be safe > than sorry by guaranteeing back-compat cruft. Note that later > patches will be using <mirror> for active block commit, but there > we don't have to worry about back-compat. >

> virt-test/tp-libvirt "virsh.blockcopy" is once again happy... Tks - ACK