On 11/3/20 7:58 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 02/11/2020 21.13, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> We deprecated the support for the 'r4k' machine for the 5.0 release
> (commit d32dc61421), which means that our deprecation policy allows
> us to drop it in release 5.2. Remove the code.
>
> To repeat the rationale from the deprecation note:
> - this virtual machine has no specification
> - the Linux kernel dropped support for it 10 years ago
>
> Users are recommended to use the Malta board instead.
>
> Acked-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson(a)linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug(a)amsat.org>
> ---
> v3: Move to "Recently removed features" section
> ---
> docs/system/deprecated.rst | 12 +-
> .../devices/mips-softmmu-common.mak | 1 -
> hw/mips/r4k.c | 318 ------------------
> MAINTAINERS | 6 -
> hw/mips/Kconfig | 13 -
> hw/mips/meson.build | 1 -
> 6 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 345 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 hw/mips/r4k.c
>
> diff --git a/docs/system/deprecated.rst b/docs/system/deprecated.rst
> index 0ebce37a191..e5b7cf274d3 100644
> --- a/docs/system/deprecated.rst
> +++ b/docs/system/deprecated.rst
> @@ -327,12 +327,6 @@ The 'scsi-disk' device is deprecated. Users should use
'scsi-hd' or
> System emulator machines
> ------------------------
>
> -mips ``r4k`` platform (since 5.0)
>
-'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
> -
> -This machine type is very old and unmaintained. Users should use the ``malta``
> -machine type instead.
> -
> mips ``fulong2e`` machine (since 5.1)
>
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
>
> @@ -575,6 +569,12 @@ The version specific Spike machines have been removed in favour
of the
> generic ``spike`` machine. If you need to specify an older version of the RISC-V
> spec you can use the ``-cpu rv64gcsu,priv_spec=v1.10.0`` command line argument.
>
> +mips ``r4k`` platform (removed in 5.2)
>
+''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
> +
> +This machine type is very old and unmaintained. Users should use the ``malta``
> +machine type instead.
Ah, just spotted this v3 - that's better now indeed :-)
Maybe change "is very old" into "was very old"?
OK.
Anyway:
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth(a)redhat.com>
Thanks!